Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Slimming men and women - Problems and suggestions on reducing the burden at the grass-roots level
Problems and suggestions on reducing the burden at the grass-roots level
Problems in reducing the burden at the grass-roots level: the complexity of grass-roots work; Fixed thinking concept; Conflict of management by objectives; Grass-roots cadres lack enthusiasm, innovation and happiness, which also causes grass-roots work to be divorced from reality. Suggestions: adhere to the problem orientation and build a solid security system; Pay attention to encouragement and care, dare to take responsibility and so on.

The problem of reducing the burden on the grassroots:

1, complexity of grass-roots work.

From the perspective of "pyramid" organizational setup, the finer and more professional the organizational setup and functional division, the more vague and integrated it will be. In the end, the decision-making and deployment of the superior will be implemented and promoted by the grassroots. Therefore, the current situation of "one-to-many" organizational structure, insufficient staffing and insufficient manpower leads to excessive burden on grassroots cadres and uneven distribution of work tasks.

2. mentality. Policy behavior is the response of grass-roots cadres according to the environment of reducing burdens within the established thinking range, and changing ideas is the premise to promote reducing burdens at the grass-roots level. On the one hand, influenced by the concepts of formalism, view of mountains and seas and trace management for a long time, there is still a process for higher-level units to change the orientation of various inspection and assessment standards.

On the other hand, grassroots cadres have doubts about the burden reduction work, and they are too cautious in their work, which leads to the overall slow progress of the burden reduction work at the grassroots level.

3. Supervise the concealment of abnormal condition.

Planning management and scientific supervision are effective means to improve the quality of grass-roots work and solve too many problems of supervision and inspection.

4. Less forms and heavier responsibilities.

Reducing the burden reduces the "useless work" and "repetitive work" brought to the grassroots. Formalism work has been reduced, which seems to be subtraction, but in fact it is addition. There are new requirements for the implementation of all work, and some work responsibilities have fallen on the shoulders of the grassroots, which has increased the burden on the grassroots. In addition, there are problems such as repeated reporting and poor communication in a central work, which leads to excessive preparation, fatigue and limited energy for grassroots cadres.

Suggestion:

1. On the basis of promoting the reform of government institutions, establish and improve the "one-to-many" and "many-to-one" institutional mechanisms of township institutions, and rationalize the responsibilities of functional departments and grass-roots party committees and governments in the grass-roots governance system.

Strictly manage the establishment of township institutions, explore the establishment of post access system for township institutions, and if county-level functional departments entrust or entrust administrative affairs within the scope of their duties to township governments, they need to review and submit for approval and fully listen to grassroots opinions, clarify the relationship between their work docking, asking for instructions and reporting, and communication, so as to lay an institutional foundation for carrying out efficient governance according to law.

2, according to the principle of "personnel matching" and "power matching", effectively enrich the grassroots work force, fully empower the grassroots party committees and governments in terms of manpower, material resources and financial resources, especially empower the grassroots urgently needed law enforcement forces in place, and create the necessary conditions for grassroots work.

3. Further change the concept. Reducing the burden on the grassroots is a top-down work, and the key lies in the upper level and is implemented at the grassroots level. Higher authorities should earnestly correct their thinking, effectively change their style of work, scientifically plan their work, rationally arrange their tasks, and make demands according to the facts. At the same time, we should take the satisfaction of the masses as the fundamental standard for inspection and assessment, and fundamentally avoid such problems as "blindfolded decision-making", "sitting on the road", "choosing the best according to scores" and "ranking according to articles".