Born in sorrow, died in happiness;

Shun was appointed from other places and selected from the plasterers who built the wall. The glue was carried from the fish and salt vendors. Guan Zhong was hired as a photo after being released from the prison officer. Sun Shuai entered the DPRK from the secluded seaside, and Prissy was photographed from the street. Therefore, God will give such a person a great mission. He must first make his heart miserable, make his bones and muscles tired and starve his body.

Let him suffer from poverty, let him do things badly, disturb his heart, strengthen his character and increase his abilities that he does not have. A person often makes mistakes in order to correct them later; Inner confusion, blocked thoughts, and then you can make a difference; Haggard and haggard, manifested in the face, singing sighs in the voice.

Then people got to know him. If there are no ministers who insist on statutes and sages who assist the king at home, and if there are no worries of hostile countries abroad, it is often easy to die. In this way, people will understand that trouble can make people live, and comfort and pleasure can make people die.

If you get a lot of help, if you lose it, you will get little help:

The weather season that is conducive to combat is not as good as the geographical situation that is conducive to combat, and the geographical situation that is conducive to combat is not as good as the will of the people who fight and unite internally.

The inner city of Li San in Fiona Fang and the outer city of Qi Li in Fiona Fang were surrounded and attacked, but they could not win. Surround and attack it, we must have got favorable weather, but we can't win. This is because the weather and place are not as good as people.

The city wall is not high, the moat is not deep, the weapons and equipment are not bad, and there is no shortage of food. However, the geographical situation conducive to combat is not satisfactory in combat, and the internal unity is the reason.

Therefore, to make people live in peace instead of moving to other places, we cannot rely on the delineation of frontiers, consolidate national defense, and shock the world by force. The monarch who can practice benevolent government will get more help and support, and the monarch who can't practice benevolent government will get less help and support.

Few people helped him, and relatives inside and outside betrayed him. So many people helped him that everyone in the world surrendered to him. By virtue of the fact that everyone in the world has surrendered to him, attacking the monarch betrayed by relatives at home and abroad, the gentleman won without fighting.

Fish is what I want;

Fish is my favorite, and bear's paw is also my favorite. If I can't have both, then I have to give up fish and choose bear's paw. Life is what I love, and righteousness is what I love. If you can't have both at the same time, then I'll have to give my life for justice.

Life is what I love, but there are some things I love more than life, so I don't drag out an ignoble existence; I hate death, but there are some things that I hate more than death, so I don't avoid some disasters. If people love nothing more than life, then what can be used for survival can't be used?

If people hate nothing more than death, what can be done to avoid disaster? You can survive by some means, but some people refuse to use it; Some methods can avoid disaster, but some people refuse to adopt them.

Therefore, they love something more precious than life (that is "righteousness"); What they hate is something more serious than death (that is "injustice"). Not only saints have this nature, everyone has it, but saints can't lose it.

A bowl of rice, a bowl of soup, you can live if you eat it, or you will starve if you don't eat it. However, when passing hungry people gave it to others contemptuously and angrily, they refused to accept it. Kicking (or stepping on) others to eat, beggars are unwilling to accept it.

(But some people) saw the generous salary of "Wanzhong" but accepted it without knowing whether it was in line with etiquette. In this case, what good is a good salary for me? Do you appreciate the splendor of my house, the service of my wife and the poor people I know? In the past, (some people) would rather die than accept it, but now (some people) accept it for the splendor of the house.

In the past (some people) would rather die than accept it, but now (some people) accept it to serve their first or second wives; In the past, (some people) would rather die than accept it, but now (some people) admire themselves for the poor people they know but accept. Can't this practice be stopped? This is called losing people's inherent sense of shame and shame.