I think it is more interesting to refer to these two words. Only internal leaders know the proportion of reference indicators in company leaders, and it is useless to use weights as reference indicators. If a company only takes thinness as its beauty, and lets those thin people be the supervisors, and gives up a person who is heavy but slightly more capable, then the company will have no future. As long as the company is not joking about its future, then this so-called face value standard is definitely not the main one.
Some people, such as asthma patients, are naturally unable to exercise vigorously and are prone to gain weight. If the company uses this attitude to test employees, it will definitely make more than half of the employees feel cold. Employees know that their weight is not up to standard, and there is no need to struggle. In fact, it is the loss of the company. Companies should pay attention to the ability of employees, even if they want to care about their health.
Weight really has nothing to do with a person's ability. Some people can't lose weight, not because they are too indulgent and have no self-discipline, but because of their own physical reasons. Not everyone wants to be a movie star, and it is worth encouraging to lose weight properly without affecting health. However, if employees force themselves to lose weight just for this reference index and cause other health problems, it is the responsibility of the company.