Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Slimming men and women - Is the new national standard of milk in China better or worse than the old version decades ago?
Is the new national standard of milk in China better or worse than the old version decades ago?
In recent years, with the pursuit of healthy life and the demand for basic nutrition, more and more people take milk as their daily drink, which is suitable for all ages in Xian Yi. Because of this, there are more and more consumer-oriented products on the market? High calcium and low fat milk? Nutritional whole milk? Fat-free milk? ...

The content and proportion of nutrients contained in milk are close to the nutrition needed by human body. According to modern nutrition research, it is found that every 100g milk contains about 87g water, 3.3g protein, 4g fat, 5g carbohydrate, 120mg calcium, and also contains iron, vitamin A, vitamin B, nicotinic acid, vitamin C and so on. Can be provided to the human body. Careful people find that the new national standard introduced some time ago is worse than the old national standard decades ago, which makes the milk quality in China almost the worst in the world.

Two years after the melamine incident, a new national standard for raw milk was issued, requiring that the total number of bacteria in raw milk should be less than 2 million per milliliter, and the protein content in raw milk should be more than 2.8 grams per100g. In this case, many small partners don't understand, so let's compare the standards of European and American countries. Developed countries in Europe and America require that the total number of bacteria should be less than 654.38+ million, and the content of protein should be more than 3g. Is it obvious? Even if this new national standard is compared with the old national standard implemented by 1986 (the total number of bacteria is required to be lower than 65438+ million, and that in protein is higher than 2.95g), there is a great retrogression.

And this new national standard is bound to benefit the above two normal temperature milk enterprises. Because the new national standard with extremely low requirements will inevitably lead to an overall decline in the quality of raw milk. Flash pasteurization can't handle such inferior raw milk, and the fresh milk will definitely exceed the standard, but the high-temperature sterilization method used for normal-temperature milk can.

Therefore, it can be said that the new national standard is beneficial to the development of normal temperature milk. As consumers, there is no need to worry too much about the quality of milk. At present, the largest pasture in China has implemented smart pasture management to strictly control the health of dairy cows and the quality of milk.