I am a professional camera manufacturer. Now it specializes in producing beauty cameras. Now I have come into contact with the two machines you mentioned, TR500 and KW 1 camera. . If the parameters are compared, including pixels and processing power, KW 1 is better than TR500. In particular, the ability to process photos TR500 in the later stage of beauty treatment is very slow. . But from a rational point of view, KW 1 seems to be just a slogan of * * *. Although the perfume bottle shape is designed. But it is still shot from the front and back angles, which is not much different from the mobile phone. . At this point, the TR500 looks much stronger when shooting at random from all angles. Secondly, the beauty effect. For beauty effect, TR500 belongs to the seventh generation Casio beauty camera. This camera has three different effects: smooth panel, wheat color, natural, whitening and one-time shooting. It also combines the advantages of TR 150 TR350. Did you eat waffles when you were a child? ",and the design level of KW 1 is not low, although there are not many bright spots. But its beauty effect is similar to 350. However, the functional options need to be improved. After all, KW 1 is Sony's first beauty camera. . .

Conclusion: If you are not short of money, I suggest you choose TR500. Artifact is the real one-step artifact. . . If you are considering ordinary travel and like to show off your * * * artifact, you can consider KW 1. .

Casio * * * artifact or Sony's micro-single?

The focus is different, Casio TR series * * * artifact is a high-end consumer camera, which is more suitable for girls * * *, with some filter effects. From the aspects of function, control, sensor and lens, Sony's micro-single is definitely much higher than Casio TR series, but * * * is not as convenient as Casio. If you like photography, Sony's micro-single is more professional.

* * * artifact, but I really don't know which is better, Sony or Casio.

Compared with my personal preference, I prefer Sony's, with fresh colors and beautiful design. Moreover, Sony itself is the world's largest camera cmos manufacturer, and Nikon uses Sony's cmos, so the quality is more guaranteed.

[Share] Which is better, Sony kw 1 *** artifact or Casio?

If you want to be white, you need TR500, and you want to be ZR 50.

* * * Which artifact is better, DoorAA or Sony?

Sony, of course. Big brands deserve information. Japanese products are good. Do you dare to buy dooraa products? Wait till it hits you!

Sony * * * artifact or Casio?

Sony's, of course Sony's new microstrip has many flip screens, which are very suitable for * * *, such as a5000, a5 100.

In terms of efficiency, Sony's micro-single image quality far exceeds Casio's so-called artifact. After all, the size difference of photosensitive elements is very obvious.

In addition, Sony's models are more affordable than Casio's. Casio's model sells for more than 6000, which is really a lie.

After comprehensive comparison, I believe you know which one to buy.

* * * Artifact Casio or Sony Black Card, which is better?

* * * Artifact is worthy of the name * * *. If you usually have a lot of * * *, micro-orders are of little use to you. In fact, tr350 is a means for the Japanese to make money in China, and the more speculation, the more expensive it is. I'm a girl, too, and I love * * *, but I really don't have any special feelings for artifacts, and I've decided to sell my artifacts and buy nex-5r ~ I'm just searching for information about 5r. When you see this question, answer it by the way, hehe. Everyone has different values, depending on personal pursuits and preferences. I like * * *, but I also like taking pictures of scenery, food and small animals, so artifacts can't satisfy me at all. The reason why I like 5r is that it can * * * (with skin beautifying function) and has primary SLR imaging. And its cost-effectiveness ratio is much higher. Isn't tr350 fired to almost 8000 now? If I were you, if I really like the micro-single, but I can't put down the * * * artifact, I'd rather buy the micro-single and use the rest of the money to buy a second-hand tr 100 or 150. Kill two birds with one stone. In fact, I don't think the artifact will take long, and I always want to buy a camera in the end. When I buy artifacts, I always take them out every day. Not at all now. After three minutes of heat, women's consumption concept is blind and impulsive. Oh, I just heard about it recently. As for the Casio * * * artifact, in fact, only the first generation tr 100 was sold in Japan, and the later 150, 200 and 350 were sold in China for the China market. I don't know, I've heard of it, but I think it's quite cheap ... (Actually, I can analyze it from another angle. If you buy tr 100,150,200, you can at least make money by reselling it, no matter whether it is 100 or 1000, you will not lose money, but if you buy TR 35438+000, more artifacts will be produced in the future. The more artifacts are produced, the lower the price will be. Because there is competition, the more artifacts people have in the future, the harder it will be to sell them. But if you are rich, forget it. Wow, I think I'm wordy. In short, my opinion is that artifacts are not worth it. No one can be sure that he can love * * * until he is old. . .

I bought a mobile phone artifact, and the Sony mobile phone doesn't work well. Why?

Because Sony's camera doesn't support volume button shooting, please download the third-party camera software yourself.

Sony * * * artifact is better than Casio. It is best to analyze it from a professional point of view. Please score 10.

In terms of ease of use and functionality, Casio is better, and the software whitening effect is good.

However, these machines are very expensive and have no cost performance.

Want to buy * * * artifact? I don't know which to buy. I bought Sony kw 1 and I feel the effect is very general! Which artifact is better? Five points.

Hello, I suggest you consider starting with the phone V4 of Mito, with 2/kloc-0.0 million pixels in front and back, equivalent focal length of 26.7mm and large aperture of F/2.2. With the brand-new Suoxi Milbeaut image processor +M-Lab exclusive noise reduction technology+front soft light fill light, its photo effect is comparable to the latest tr600, but the price is only half that of tr, and the cost performance is quite high! Many Casio users have put Casio in the closet and used Mito mobile phones. At present, Mito mobile phone is also very popular in the network celebrity circle and entertainment circle. Needless to say, there is a beautiful photo taken by Mito at the wedding in Liu Shishi just past! Except * * *, even videos can be beautiful, but as long as there is enough space, you can record beauty videos for a long time, not only the beauty of photos, but also the beauty of videos! The rear photo is also pretty good. It is enough to take a V4 when traveling. I suggest you pay attention to Sina Weibo @ Meitu mobile phone. At present, their official blog has travel photos forwarded by various users, and the scenery is really beautiful. Hope to adopt, hope to adopt!