Why am I against Buddhism?
Editor's note: Buddhism is not a religion, but a Buddhist education. It has its own complete world outlook, but its understanding of the origin of the world conflicts with our local beliefs. So far, only our ancestors' understanding of the universe may be the closest to the truth. Jealous people can still stick to their worldview, and we must and should be able to stick to our worldview. For foreign things, we can only stay at the application level. In other words, middle school is the body and foreign learning is the use. Finally, we will build our faith into the most perfect and impeccable belief system. To get to the point, let me give two examples first: I heard that western countries began to legislate for Chinese medicine, which was a good thing at first. Later, I learned that the west did not accept the concept of Chinese medicine, but legislated for herbs and acupuncture respectively, and it was not aimed at China, but divided into "European herbs", "Indian herbs" and "China herbs", and acupuncture was also divided into "American acupuncturists" and "Korean acupuncturists" The concept of holistic treatment of patients in traditional Chinese medicine has not been directly absorbed, but has been developed and improved. The Chinese medicine system is already perfect. I don't know if the band-aid was inspired by China plaster, but I know that Chinese medicine alone can be divided into pills, plaster, decoction, powder and so on. And the treatment methods are very rich. It can be said that we all have western medicine today, but not necessarily. In this case, West Renye Fang tried to annex Chinese medicine into their western medicine system. It can be seen how unwilling they are and how cowardly we are. This reminds me of another example. The ancient architecture in China is a frame structure. After introducing western learning, he began to learn western architecture and gave up developing traditional architecture. Later, western architects discovered the frame structure, which is considered as a major breakthrough in the history of architecture, especially for high-rise buildings. While admiring the greatness of western architects, our architects study with trepidation. I cite these two examples to show that foreign things can and should be actively absorbed, but they must be incorporated into our own system, which is the real absorption. Some people may object to my saying so. For example, westerners didn't believe in jealousy at first, but later they absorbed it all. That's because they were barbarians when they invaded Rome, and there was nothing systematic in their beliefs. When they become civilized people, the absorption of foreign cultures, as I said before, must be broken first, and then useful fragments should be implanted into their own systems. So some people may object. Didn't the Romans believe in Greek gods before, but later they converted to jealousy? The problem is that the Greek gods' religion is also foreign to the Romans, and then admit that jealousy of religion is forced by practical reasons. It is for this reason that after the demise of Eastern Rome, no one dared to say clearly that he was a descendant of the Romans. Because believing in jealousy doesn't mean he is descended from Rome. I read the Diamond Sutra a long time ago, and later I was inspired by the master's understanding of Buddhism. Later, due to the study of shakuhachi, I came across some masters of Pure Land Sect (my teacher is also a Pure Land Sect) and the masters of Japanese Guangying Temple. Later, I saw Hokkekyo and got a preliminary understanding of Buddhism. Buddhism is not a religion, but a Buddhist education. It has its own complete world outlook, but its understanding of the origin of the world conflicts with our local beliefs. Because of this, I am against Buddhism. In fact, our sages have already discussed useful truth in it. Even the truth is universal, and our descendants will naturally think of it one day. Why do you say these are Buddhist views? In fact, not only Buddhism, but also any kind of belief, including Marxism today, should have an overall exposition of the whole universe. Every belief is a complete system. So far, only our ancestors' understanding of the universe may be the closest to the truth. Jealous people can still stick to their worldview, and we must and should be able to stick to our worldview. For foreign things, we can only stay at the application level. In other words, middle school is the body and foreign learning is the use. Finally, we will build our faith into the most perfect and impeccable belief system.