At present, China is promoting judicial openness, and all effective judgments made by people's courts will be published online. Idle and boring, I often read online and found that there are only two writing modes of the current judgment: one is narrative writing; The second is to discuss writing methods.

First, narrative writing: tell a story and make a judgment according to the plot. Advantages: This writing method conforms to people's reading habits and is easy to read. Disadvantages: 1, paying attention to the narrative of what happened, ignoring the record of facts and the authentication of evidence, suspected of overlord trial; 2. Because of the emphasis on the narration of what happened, for the convenience of narration, some irrelevant facts are bound to be identified. However, these facts can also be regarded as unsubstantiated facts in other cases, which will easily lead to the contradiction of identifying facts between cases.

Second, the writing method of the argument: it is to authenticate the focus facts or core evidence of the dispute between the two sides and make a judgment accordingly. Advantages: 1, this writing conforms to the law of judicial cognition, because finding out the facts is not the purpose of judgment, and the purpose of judgment is to judge disputes, so the facts of the case are not important, but the key is to judge the focus of disputes; 2. Remember the process of the judge authenticating the evidence and facts, so that people can understand how the facts of the case are obtained. Disadvantages: it does not conform to people's reading habits and increases the difficulty of reading.

The above two written judgments have their own advantages and disadvantages. Only by combining the two, we can record the facts of the case and the evidence and facts, which is the judgment we can understand. And the judgment that we can all understand is truly in line with the law of justice.