Not to mention finishing the work on time, this section chief never works in the office. It's no use calling him if you need anything. He never works. The middle-level cadres of the unit should circulate the documents and jump on him. The task assigned to the department should be signed by the department, so you can only find the leader in charge and call him at the weekly office meeting. He is always too upset to attend.
The most amazing thing is that his face can't be touched even if it's personal. I am in charge of archives and need him to fill out his resume. He has only one office and asked me to put an empty form into his office through the door. Then one morning, I found his dirty form on the office floor.
In fact, he still has certain abilities personally. Our unit is engaged in technology. 1968 graduated from a famous university of technology, and had a strong business in the 1980s. Most of the cadres were appointed by superiors. He was accepted by the city's public examination. His English level is rare in the whole system. If you can't translate some technical terms in English materials, you have to ask him for help.
He became like this because he was punished: his office was on the sixth floor, but his computer was broken. When he got a computer from the network administrator on the third floor, the inspectors found that he was not at work. Colleagues said he was on the third floor, and the inspection team asked him to come up, but he refused. On the phone, he told the inspectors that you just checked whether I was on the job and could not affect my work. The inspector complained to our competent department, and the competent department gave him discipline education, that is, leadership criticism education. In fact, it was not an administrative punishment, but a document was issued and put on record. This is not an injury or insult, and he refuses to accept such treatment.
He thinks highly of himself and looks down on others. The most important thing is that he has a rich wife, who is the boss of a listed company and is worth hundreds of millions. He doesn't care about the money the company makes. No one can stop a person without the pressure of life. No matter which leader asks him to talk about his work, he just says: if you do more, you make more mistakes. What should I do if I work hard and get a disciplinary criticism?
Later, it became more and more troublesome, and he filled in personal property, and he only filled in salary income. People say your house and car. He said my wife bought it, and you can give it to me. I thank you. It is stipulated that the personal passports of leaders above the intermediate level shall be kept by the unit in a unified way. He also believes that leaders can't help it if personal belongings are not handed in. He asked the manager to write an iou, and he signed it, which was regarded as the custody of the unit. He lent it out.
It's not that the leader doesn't want to care about him. His head is not good like this. Who cares? Everyone says you're a bully. But when checking attendance, he clocks in at six o'clock in the morning and eight o'clock in the evening every day: his home is near his work, he goes out to exercise in the morning and clocks in when he passes by his work at night. I don't know. I thought he was working overtime day and night. If you want to dismiss him and report his behavior, the competent department will definitely think that our leader is useless and even a subordinate can't manage it well: last time he went to the director's office to report to the director. He was the seed of the university debate team and talked in the director's office all morning. He left the front foot, and the director called our leader in the back foot and scolded him: he listened to him all morning without doing anything. Does the leader dare to provoke him again? Besides, it's all about work, not personal. Who would do anything to offend this man?
However, this awesome man was exposed because of his extramarital affairs and was cured by his wife. Life cannot be perfect. It's good to have a rich wife, but he flies all over the country, including abroad, and seldom takes care of his family. So the section chief fell in love with a married woman on a lonely night.
It is said that rabbits don't eat grass near their nests. He not only eats, but also eats very close. He fell in love with a female colleague in the same department. Her father-in-law is also a small leader of our competent bureau. You can imagine how bloody it is. Anyway, eventually lesbians divorced early.
A female colleague's divorce is like a chicken flying a dog jumping. No one can persuade him to leave. At this time, I can see the power of his wife: I bought him a Land Rover and sent my daughter to study abroad. Money can make anyone rational. The section chief suddenly felt that if he divorced, his living standard would change from heaven to underground, so his determination to divorce was not so firm. Women are the most sensitive and feel the change immediately, so they start to push, push slowly, and finally quarrel, and female colleagues are disheartened and remarry.
At this time, the section chief's wife filed for divorce: in fact, she wanted to leave long ago, but she didn't want to take advantage of them, so she had to toss the couple and leave. His wife's share in the company is not his share, and there is a fault. He didn't get any money. He can't afford his daughter to go abroad. The daughter went to find his wife, who said she would stay abroad in the future. It is not easy for the section chief to see her.
The section chief felt that he was fooled by his wife, and his colleagues in the unit would also talk behind his back and make fun of him, so he didn't want to appear in the unit. However, without a rich wife, his job is more important. He wears either a baseball cap or a hoodie every morning. He goes to work before people come and only gets off work when everyone has left. We agreed to leave him a good meal, and then he came down and put it in the microwave oven. He still doesn't work in the office, but he is in his lounge, closing the door, closing the curtains and hiding inside. If you want to find him, you will find him, but we don't look for him at ordinary times and think he has become a bit strange. He's used to it without him anyway.
Article 15 of the Regulations on Personnel Management of Public Institutions issued by the State Council on 20 14 clearly stipulates that-
According to this regulation, employees of public institutions do not go to work at both ends for three days. If they accumulate more than 30 days in 1 year, they will obviously be fired. This is very clear in policy.
However, although it is clear in theory, the actual operation is another matter. In reality, few people in public institutions, especially in the establishment, are fired or dismissed for this reason. The smaller the unit, the more common it is to fish for three days and dry the net for two days, and the less likely it is that someone will be fired or dismissed. The reason is that everyone eats in the same pot without looking up at each other. As long as there is no hate for killing his father, no one will rashly smash other people's jobs, do such things that harm others and do nothing for themselves, create opponents or contradictions for themselves, and lay a curse for personal development. China people are used to hello, I am good, and everyone is good. They pay attention to wit and moderation, and the secular environment determines that this kind of thing cannot happen too much.
There are several real examples around, one of which is the staff of the second-floor organization below the unit. It seems that I haven't worked hard since my first day in the company. Either I have something at home today, or I feel unwell tomorrow, or I have to go to the hospital the day after tomorrow. I always take ten days off a month, plus legal weekends and other holidays, and have a rest for at least half a month. As always, I have been paid for more than ten years, and there seems to be no problem. Of course, his family conditions are still relatively good. His father is still a small leader who works in the system and has a certain personal relationship with the unit leader. The latter does not look at the monk's face, but at the Buddha's face. Often don't care about him, give him free space objectively, and give him the opportunity to ask for leave once every three days.
Several other people around me are in a similar situation. We can find several similarities from them: First, the family background is basically good, either rich or someone, which makes them confident to skip work; Second, although these people often skip work, they all have certain strategies, that is, try to respect and not offend the leaders; Third, they often do not strive for fame and gain, do not pursue progress, have no interest disputes with others, and objectively create good external conditions for themselves and can play around.
Therefore, it is not without reason that people in some institutions often skip work and are not fired. Although this kind of wind can't be encouraged, the reality also exists objectively.
Two people in our school have been absent from work for a long time and are still teachers.
One is a woman, transferred from other places. Her husband runs a business and has a lot of money. On the day of registration, her husband drove her to school in a BMW and went back with her husband after completing the formalities.
It's hard to see her face after that. It is said that she teaches chemistry, and her name has never been on the class schedule of the guidance office, let alone in class.
At that time, people had to go to the general affairs office to sign and withdraw money when they paid their wages. We only saw her name on the payroll.
First she asked for marriage leave, then she asked for maternity leave.
Two years later, she only appeared once in a while, sometimes getting paid and sometimes asking the principal for something.
After a long time, she became familiar with the teachers at school, so she stayed at school for a long time, sometimes once a week, sometimes two or three times a week.
Don't think she's here for class!
The purpose of her coming to school is to find someone to fight the landlord to play mahjong. Several male teachers who played with her welcomed her very much, because her luck was really bad, and nine times out of ten she lost! The more she loses, the more she fights, and the more she loses. She often comes home late. Sometimes her husband drives to pick her up.
There were not many private cars in the 1980s and 1990s, and teachers called her "Queen Gong"!
After a long time, the teachers in class have great opinions. Said she didn't attend class, got paid, and played in a mess all day!
In order to take care of everyone's mood, the principal asked her to rest at home and never come to school again.
Did you fire her?
Don't! She is still a teacher! It's just that she has to pay a sum of money to the school, and the school lists her as an income-generating person in the school-run factory.
This is not a problem. Her husband has a lot of money. In this way, she is still a teacher, a teacher who never attends classes.
Maybe he's retired now!
The other is a male teacher who teaches English. At that time, he was in his twenties and used to be a student in our school.
In the early 1990s, we advocated "going to the sea" to do business. He went to the sea.
At first, like a female teacher, he paid a sum of money to keep the teacher qualification certificate for the school. Later, because I just went to the sea, the "water quality" was not good and I couldn't make money. In addition, the state has a policy of "leaving without pay", so he went through the formalities of "leaving without pay".
The result of "leaving your job without pay" is that you are light without debt. Even if he doesn't pay the school, the school won't pay him.
"The sky is high, the sea is wide, and the dragon swims." After he stopped paying, he engaged in direct selling, selling insurance, advertising ... and finally made a lot of money by selling car GPS systems.
Because his teacher establishment is still there, the policy of "leaving without pay" has long since ceased to exist, and he cannot be dismissed. What are we going to do? Retire!
He retired before he was fifty, and his retirement salary (now called pension) was more than 4000 yuan. My pension is only over 5000 yuan.
He now has double money, one is the pension given to him by the state finance, and the other is the profit from his own business. Two copies add up to a higher income than a special-grade teacher!
There is no doubt that the staff of public institutions who don't come to work for three days are generally not fired, but they can be dismissed according to law. Why do you say that?
The specific description of the topic is: when the department's own work can be completed on time and the things arranged by the leaders are delayed.
First of all, the staff of public institutions are full-time staff who are incorporated into the national career establishment and legally employed in the name of the country according to the special procedures stipulated by administrative regulations, mainly providing professional and technical services to the public, and their wages and benefits are borne by the financial department. They are not only national staff, but also financial support personnel and the main part of public officials. At present, the administrative regulations applicable to the comprehensive management of staff in public institutions in China are the Regulations on Personnel Management in Public Institutions, which was promulgated in the State Council in 20 14 and implemented in July 14. Its legislative purpose is to standardize the personnel management of public institutions, protect the legitimate rights and interests of the staff of public institutions, build a high-quality staff of public institutions and promote the development of public services.
From a macro point of view, it is undoubtedly natural for the state to strengthen management, strict requirements and assessment according to regulations for the staff of public institutions with a total of nearly 40 million people. From a personal point of view, the staff of every institution should naturally abide by the law, conscientiously do their job, obey the work arrangement and deployment of the unit, and abide by the work discipline of the unit. After all, official occasions are by no means family. Come and leave whenever you want, depending on your temper.
Secondly, how to deal with the work of institutions that don't come to work for three days? In the daily management of public institutions, the attendance system is established normally, and you must ask for leave if you have something, and you must not go to work for no reason. What's the use of asking you?
If you don't go to work at both ends for three days, have a complete attendance or sign-in system, and are absent from work for more than 15 days in a row, or for more than 30 days in a year, the unit has the right to unilaterally terminate the employment contract according to legal procedures, but it must be approved by the local social department.
Article 15 of the Regulations on Personnel Management of Public Institutions clearly stipulates: "If the staff of a public institution is absent from work for more than 15 working days, or for more than 30 working days in 1 year, the public institution may terminate the employment contract." This is a clear policy basis, including two legal situations: 1, one-time continuous absenteeism 15 days; 2. Accumulated absenteeism exceeds 30 days in one year.
What I want to emphasize here is that the unit unilaterally proposes to terminate the employment contract. In fact, the unit only has the right to make suggestions and has no final decision. Its operating procedure is: the unit declares to the local social department, and after the approval of the social department, it is submitted to the executive meeting of the local people's government at or above the county level for research and decision. In other words, the final decision of the staff of public institutions to terminate the employment contract shall be uniformly exercised by the government executive meeting. In the final analysis, the state still holds a very cautious attitude towards the issue of state staff, and simply does not allow it to go its own way.
In addition, before the promulgation of the Regulations on Personnel Management of Public Institutions, this kind of situation was directly called dismissal in the Interim Provisions on Staff Assessment of Public Institutions (No.1995) formulated by the Ministry of Personnel. Therefore, the so-called termination of the employment contract now is the dismissal mentioned before.
To sum up, at present, there are only two legal situations in which a public institution can unilaterally terminate the employment contract or dismiss its staff: one is that it fails to observe the work discipline of the unit and is absent from work within one year 15 days or more; The other is that the assessment is unqualified, and in the final analysis, it is simply incompetent. Article 16 of the Regulations has clear provisions. In addition to these two statutory circumstances, institutions have no right to give staff the treatment of terminating employment contracts.
Finally, answer the question raised by the topic: will employees of public institutions be fired if they don't come to work at two ends for three days? It must be particularly emphasized here that dismissal is the most severe administrative or administrative punishment, which will cause the staff to be completely unemployed and the legal consequences will be very serious. Dismissal of the staff in the system must meet the conditions stipulated by laws or administrative regulations: 1, I have really committed serious violations of law and discipline, or even been investigated for criminal responsibility according to law because it has constituted a crime; 2, I have illegal and criminal acts, by the unit, the supervisory organ to start the investigation procedure according to law and the investigation is true, or the court has made a criminal judgment according to law and has officially taken effect. Otherwise, there is no prerequisite for dismissing the staff.
At present, the staff of public institutions have been dismissed, and the laws, administrative regulations and administrative rules are based on the Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) on Administrative Punishment of Public Officials, the Regulations on Personnel Management of Public Institutions and the Interim Provisions on Punishment of Staff of Public Institutions. In other words, in order to dismiss the staff of public institutions, we must find very clear and specific penalties for violations of law and discipline in the above three provisions. Otherwise, it is bound to be unfounded.
Obviously, if the staff of public institutions just don't abide by the work discipline of the unit or are incompetent, the general handling procedure is to terminate the employment contract, that is, to dismiss. Only when I have committed very serious violations of law and discipline after investigation, or have been investigated for criminal responsibility according to law, can I be dismissed according to law. In the final analysis, dismissal and dismissal are completely different legal concepts dealing with staff, and each has its own scope of application. Make a thorough distinction, and don't talk nonsense.
Finally, to sum up, it is a sentence: employees of public institutions will definitely not be fired if they don't come to work for three days, but they can be dismissed (dismissed) according to law. As for whether the unit will dismiss the staff of public institutions who spend three days fishing and two days drying nets, it is actually entirely up to the unit itself. After all, different units have completely different management systems and assessment methods; At the same time, any system is implemented by people, some are strict, some are inevitably slack, and muddle along. This is self-evident.
No. Don't say, I don't go to work all year round, nothing, nothing. Some leaders dare not ask, let alone manage. [yi tooth] [yi tooth]
It's okay not to go to work all the year round (what do ordinary people do? ! )。 The key is not to go to work, but also to go back to Man Qin every year, which occupies the senior title establishment of the unit (others can't get on), all the benefits are the same, and there is a lot of money (the rest are actually leave deductions). ) The work that he (they) should do, of course, was done by others (he grabbed the grades, but he didn't make mistakes at work). He didn't provoke anyone, and he didn't make trouble. He had good things to do. Come here once in a while, cocky, pointing, pointing, the legendary swordsman, don't you think it's amazing? [Cover your face] [Cover your face] [Cover your face]
Do you have it there? friends.
According to the staff of public institutions, there are job arrangements. In principle, a radish is empty, no one takes over, and no one is qualified for the post. If you don't come to work for three days, you still have to pay. Nobody asked. Nobody cares. There must be a reason according to this question, right? Personally, I think institutions must have strict rules and regulations, and the punishment and handling system should be improved. 2. This person is in charge of logistics, such as electrician, foreman, logistics, kitchen staff, handyman, etc. Treat splits differently. Why don't you go to work? 3。 If it doesn't belong to the logistics department or the organizational discipline system of the unit is not established, it's all caused by this! 4. The trade union, party committee and office of the Commission for Discipline Inspection of this kind of personal unit are responsible for talking and solving problems, and should not affect the staff in the unit!
No, they have more than a month's annual leave, and they can deduct something from it. Some units have nothing to do, unless there is a better place to go, they can leave at one o'clock. If you don't care about the leader, then you can bye bye.
There is no need to repeat the contents of the Regulations on the Administration of Cadres here. There are policies in the top and countermeasures in the bottom, and there is still a certain gap between theory and practice.
Here are some real examples:
1. Mr. Chen is in his fifties this year. He has been working for nearly 30 years. Throughout the year, he can count the number of times he came to work in the unit with one hand, usually once in July when he was in general party membership meeting, and he can't see it at other times, even the general meeting of all cadres.
2. Jason is a career establishment, with more than ten years of service. A few years ago, she entered into a business partnership with others. After getting better, she devoted all her energy to her business. Now people have been doing business in the provincial capital, and no one will answer the phone except the person in charge of the unit. However, no matter how the top leaders scold and persuade her, she just won't come back and refuse to resign. After two years, her performance has been deducted, but the basic salary is still more than 2,000 yuan per month.
3. Brother Jin and Brother Hong are slightly better than the above two vicious people. They can meet at least once a day, although they can only meet once, because they never go to the office and go home or go shopping in the morning after signing in. In this case, the leaders turned a blind eye and only asked them to sign in on time every day. Whether they go to work or not is their freedom.
Xiao Wang is under 30 years old. When he started working, he spent three days fishing and two days drying nets. He comes after nine o'clock every day. He will rest for three hours at noon and leave at four in the afternoon. There are no special circumstances. He doesn't come to work on Thursday and Friday. I can't help it His parents work in a hospital, and they can prove that he is ill before each leave.
Maybe every unit has the above malicious role. They are like fish escaping from the system. They don't want to make progress themselves. As long as they are at leisure, their best hope is to eat empty pay. In fact, not only these people, but also many people who want to do this but dare not. Tell the truth, isn't it enviable not to get paid at work?
There used to be a popular saying that as long as you are brave, you can rest for seven days a week, which is really accurate.
Who dares not come to work for three days? Actually, there are two kinds of people who can. First, leaders who retreat to the second line, the unit does not arrange their specific work, and new leaders generally do not care; Second, retired old workers have nothing to do at work, and young people don't want old comrades to intervene in some things at work, so they just fish for three days and dry their nets for two days, which is very common in de facto units.
As far as most parts of the country are concerned, this will not happen, but it is necessary to communicate with the leaders in advance to show respect.
1, within the system
In the system, especially in administrative institutions, if the workload of staff in the unit is not large, or the leaders of Buddhist survivors basically do not arrange work, some staff members will not take up their posts every day, but only come to the unit occasionally when they have nothing to do, and wander around when the news is tight. As long as they don't give trouble to the leaders, they generally won't be interviewed, and they won't be fired. You don't have to worry.
2. Premise
The staff of public institutions don't often go to work, fishing for three days and drying nets for two days, so they can't do whatever they want. They also need to do some preparatory work to get the consent of the leaders and not cause the comparison of colleagues. Communicate with the top leader in advance, don't arrange more work or not, and then find a suitable reason to tell the leader that you may not come often and get the verbal consent of the leader. After communicating with the top leaders, you need to communicate with the competent leaders to help them express your respect for them. Second, don't make trouble for leaders, for example, don't fight for all kinds of treatment and benefits, and leaders can't give you a balance, for example, don't do illegal and criminal things. Third, if there are some jobs,
In fact, everything is done by people. As long as you don't make trouble and show off, there is generally no big problem.