This is a sentence often mentioned in safety management. This formulation can easily be interpreted as: production and safety are two different things. At the grassroots level, we can often hear some management cadres say, "When there is a contradiction between production and safety, production gives way to safety." This concept and understanding seems to be beyond doubt. But if you chew the meaning carefully, the bread here contains an important concept-safety is an additional task of production management and a task under the pressure of the situation. Everyone knows that production and safety are the unity of opposites. There are inevitable safety problems in production organization. If the safety problem is not solved well, it will easily lead to accidents and even production interruption. This is particularly evident in the oil drilling industry. This misunderstanding and deviation between safety and production also appears in assessment, evaluation and selection. Although the proportion of safety management assessment has been adjusted in recent years, the composition of work performance is more of constantly refreshed production data and indicators. Other work achievements become "soft indicators" in the actual assessment. In fact, if a unit has not had an accident at a relative stage, it does not mean that the safety performance of this unit is very outstanding. This kind of ideological understanding also leads to the fuzziness of the main unit of safety management. At present, almost all units or enterprises have identified the main unit of safety management as the HSE management department and safety management personnel at all levels of the unit. This is why, after problems occur in safety production, more accusations often point to the main leaders, competent leaders and safety departments. The premise of management work is to fully mobilize and master all kinds of resources to play their role and ability, so as to successfully achieve the ultimate management goal. In addition, our current management mode is typical linear management, and each department and manager is given control over some resources and processes. In the process of HSE management, it is no exception. Only when managers consider safety and production as a whole and fully mobilize and utilize all positive factors can they achieve and establish good safety management performance. This requires all departments and managers at all levels to conscientiously perform and undertake HSE responsibilities according to their respective division of labor. Only in this way can scientific management be realized in the true sense. Only in this way can we fundamentally change the current situation that safety management cannot meet the needs of rapid development of enterprises.

Second, by strengthening the training of employees, improve their safety awareness.

This is an experience often mentioned in improving employees' safety awareness. Training is very important in the development of enterprises, and it also plays a self-evident role in improving employees' safety awareness and operational skills. However, the gap between training effect and expectation is getting bigger and bigger. What is the reason? First of all, in the understanding of training. We expect to improve the safety awareness of employees through training, and then improve the safety performance in operation. However, this is just our wishful thinking. Safety awareness may be improved through training, so as long as training, good safety behavior will inevitably occur? It turns out that this is not necessarily the case. Also, qualified training only solves the problem of "how to do it" for employees, but does not solve the problem of "must do it" for employees. There are many ways to cultivate consciousness, such as the construction of corporate culture. Through the enterprise's unique values, behavior norms and work style, we can establish a sense that meets the needs of enterprise development and influence the behavior of employees. The cultivation of safety awareness is no exception. In cultural construction, it is more important to improve the HSE system. At present, our institutional system has basically taken shape. The training system is also improving day by day. Only by forming an atmosphere in which training teaches everyone "how to do" and the system restricts everyone "must do" can we fundamentally change and enhance the safety awareness and behavior of cadres and workers.

Three, in the face of the accident immediately form an accident investigation team, and the relevant responsible person for serious treatment.

This is understandable from the perspective of paying attention to accidents. But the ultimate goal of accident investigation is not only to punish the responsible person, but more importantly, to find out the cause of the accident, so that more people can know the truth of the accident to the maximum extent, really learn from the accident and avoid similar accidents from happening again. The accident investigation report system is a method to find out the cause and truth of the accident. Whether it is the "Safety Production Law" or the "Regulations on Enterprise Safety Management", there are clear provisions on the handling of responsible persons. Which one is violated will be implemented. The crux of the problem is how to let every employee know the cause of the accident. In addition to subjective and objective reasons, the more important reason is deep-seated management reasons. The big international companies represented by DuPont have a common understanding of accidents-any accident is caused by management mistakes. Managers at all levels are directly responsible for the accident. It is in this respect that we pay too much attention to the handling of the person responsible for the accident without analyzing the reasons. 167 people were killed when the British Alpha oil rig exploded and caught fire. It took the British government three years to send an accident investigation team to conduct a comprehensive and detailed investigation of the accident and put forward 106 suggestions. There is a profound saying: the investigation reports of major accidents in recent years show that these dangers are caused by serious mistakes in safety management of large institutions. These suggestions affect the safety status report, safety management system and goal setting regulations. These three suggestions laid a foundation for the formation of HSE management system in the future. The "12.23" accident in Chongqing has taught us many deep-seated reasons, which are worthy of serious consideration by every manager. It is worth noting that the accident investigation report is an important means for enterprises to improve and perfect their management methods. The cost of blood and huge losses proved the hidden dangers and consequences of violation. How to make it play a greater role in safety management is also worth studying and discussing. There is a famous saying in safety management-treat violations as accidents. This is the understanding of nip in the bud. As we all know, violations and hidden dangers are only important factors in accidents. When the conditions are not met, there will be no consequences of accidents. Even after the accident, quite a few people are always used to judging the severity of the incident subjectively by the severity of the incident process. As we all know, although some accidents have not caused casualties on the surface, even property losses are relatively small. However, the potential hazards and consequences of accidents are often overlooked. This is an irresponsible attitude and a manifestation of low management level and short-sightedness. It is also a manifestation of ideology that does not respect the laws of science. Therefore, it is necessary to classify and analyze hidden dangers and violations regularly and quantitatively. Look for deep-seated management reasons. Take various management measures including safety education, training and punishment. Only by earnestly fulfilling the HSE supervision responsibilities of managers and departments at all levels can accidents be fundamentally and effectively controlled.

In accident cause analysis and responsibility division, we often focus on the person directly responsible and the on-site employees. The analysis of management is limited to the competent leaders and HSE management departments, and some responsibilities are shared according to their duties or positions, not according to the responsibility system for production safety and management scope. Often, after being punished, some management cadres are not clear about what has happened in their management, and they can't see the traces of lessons. This is the result of the lack of scientific and systematic analysis of the accident.

Fourth, people-oriented.

Building a harmonious enterprise or mining area mostly stays in reports and articles, but it is not reflected in some specific work, especially in safety production.

1, the question of workers' leave. During the petroleum congress, the country was in trouble, and all the conditions were very difficult. What do we do? By spirit. Daqing was achieved by the Iron Man Spirit, and China Petroleum developed by leaps and bounds by the Iron Man Spirit. Promoted the promotion of national strength. At that time, many people voluntarily gave up their rest time. This spirit is more worthy of respect than the interests of the country and the people. However, working outside for a long time, lacking care and care for the family, has led to many family problems to varying degrees. In the 2 1 century, when people begin to talk about people-oriented and building a harmonious society, how should we understand and embody this scientific and reasonable concept? The author believes that, first of all, the management should arrange as many holidays as possible through planned arrangements, so that employees can mediate the anxiety, fatigue and other bad emotions brought about by work through normal family life and devote themselves to work with a fuller mental state. When praising and affirming Comrade XXX's achievements, don't make it a condition that you don't go home for something. This concept is somewhat incompatible with the people-oriented concept. Admittedly, this kind of professionalism is worth learning, but managers should take the initiative to do more life considerations for employees, arrange employees' rest reasonably and properly, and make people-oriented not just stay in words and words. Let employees truly understand and feel the benefits brought by scientific management.

2, the worker work in spite of illness. Due to historical reasons, the number of such workers has been quite large, especially some workers who have worked in harsh conditions in the field for a long time, and they have accumulated over time. If they are only allowed to rest and treat diseases, they will still work with illness in the face of the reality of reduced income. This not only poses a threat to the health of employees, but also lays a hidden danger for safe production. There are also some employees who get sick at work because of factors such as working environment or labor intensity. If it is not handled in time, it will also bring hidden dangers to safety production, and its responsibility will also be borne by managers. In this case, we should actively arrange for them to get proper rest and physical conditioning. Only a healthy body and mind can quickly improve work efficiency.

To sum up, safety management has developed from past experience management to advanced HSE system management. HSE system management is not only rich in connotation, but more importantly, it embodies advanced management concepts and ideas. If the problems such as vague concepts and cognitive deviation of safety and production are not solved, the consequences will directly affect the normal operation and promotion effect of HSE management system. There will also be an embarrassing situation in which we use advanced management mode and accidents continue. It is hoped that managers and departments at all levels will take seriously and reflect on the gains and losses in our work, get rid of this deviation as soon as possible and fulfill their respective HSE management responsibilities.