Zhang Jingchu, Hong Tao and others shared the benefits of vegetarianism in Tencent's video Vegetarian Walker, which is a positive thing. Ha ha. Because it is everyone's right to share what they like or like with others, and the original intention of doing so is to hope that others can be as good as themselves. As for whether others accept it or not, or whether others have benefited or suffered from it, it is not the problem of the active sharer. Because everyone (adult) should think rationally about his choice. If you choose to trust the sharer, abandon your previous opinions or behaviors and keep up with the sharer, then you should be responsible for your choice. As long as the opinions or behaviors shared by the sharers are not anti-science and anti-human, and there is evidence that the opinions or behaviors shared by the sharers are indeed practiced by ta.

Second, compared with eating meat, whether vegetarianism is more beneficial to human body or society may require investigation and study. The scientific methods are, of course, experimental research and statistical comparison. For example, randomly select several people and divide them into two groups. One group was vegetarian during the experiment, while the other group kept a daily diet during the experiment. Finally, compare the health data of the two groups (including the comparison between the members of each group before and after the experiment). Of course, such an experiment may be difficult to carry out, such as how long it takes for the experiment to be convincing, and it may not be easy to reach an understanding. Then, the most convenient experiment is that singles choose to let themselves eat vegetarian food for a period of time, such as one month or three months, to see what effect it has. If there is a good influence, you will accept the vegetarian statement, if there is a bad influence, you will not accept the vegetarian statement and still go back to your daily diet.