Taking such an alarmist topic is mainly based on two considerations: first, Chinese should not be what we originally taught, and the original image of Chinese needs to be re-recognized and rediscovered; Second, even today, when the new curriculum standard claims to have achieved numerous "fruitful results", it is still much worse under the lively scene, and few people really take medicine for "treatment".
A sober man of insight once pointed out that there is something wrong with Chinese education in China. How deep is this problem, where is the root, and how to make Gan Kun thoroughly remould himself and make him look brand-new. These are all topics that many people are willing to discuss, but I think the discussion of these topics should at least not be the reason why we are still walking slowly in the classroom with textbooks. No matter how grand the idea is, no matter how advanced it is, it is ultimately up to our teacher to bring it into the classroom. In fact, how to teach Chinese is often "we" who have the final say. With such power in your hand, can you not feel its heaviness? How to teach Chinese well should be an urgent task for us to study at present.
Under the guidance of the new curriculum standards, how did we enter the classroom today? The new curriculum standard requires that the object of education should be people, not knowledge system; It is required that the development of students should be the goal of education, rather than sending them to higher schools with high scores; Knowledge and ability, process and method, emotional attitude and values are three dimensions of classroom education, not knowledge consistency. If a teacher wants to shift his eyes from textbooks to students, he should not only see his today, but also pay attention to his tomorrow, so that he can master the ability to use while learning knowledge, be influenced by the spirit and accumulate cultural literacy. All this is a question of how to think and how to do it.
Today's Chinese language bears too much pressure, as if it were a big basket, into which everything can be put: 5,000 years of traditional culture, the moral norms of life, the norms of speaking, writing and reading, and even the shaping and positioning of life ideals should and can naturally become the unshirkable responsibilities of Chinese people. Unfortunately, Chinese is not a Transformers and cannot be manipulated. Or, transformers. It is up to you to change. It can be anything, but it is no longer a language. In life, people always have a suspicion of commodities with too many functions. Whether a medicine that can cure all diseases is a medicine is a big problem in itself. The same language, why learning a foreign language is more interesting? We can't just say that the policy is tilted, because in the big environment, foreign languages are relatively simple and there is not so much extra burden. Is this also the reason? What should we do when there are too many functions and people are dazzled? Either be an essential oil or an analgesic cream, and stick it wherever you feel uncomfortable. It can't be wrong if it can't be cured anyway. Who will take it seriously? Either find a function to use at last, or at least find North. Therefore, the meaning of "three" and "four" in "no three, no four" and the explanation of "steaming" are all in the examination papers of primary school students. No matter how mysterious it is, it is true to get a score.
It can be seen that Chinese teachers don't understand "Chinese", which is really not alarmist! Therefore, how we teach Chinese today is by no means to raise Chinese to a new height of an era, nor does it mean that the new curriculum standard shoulders a heavy historical mission; On the contrary, the new curriculum standard is to reduce the burden and slim down the "Chinese". The bloated and stumbling Chinese has a smart pace, beautiful appearance and thin figure. In the 1960s, Singapore, a small country just emerging from colonial rule, turned to invite European and American capital to return. At that time, we were keen on the "revolution" of "the people of Asia, Africa and Latin America want liberation", and now it is our turn to "reform". Unless we want to do something else, teaching Chinese is not what we want to do, nor is it what we want to do.
This is my personal thinking and understanding of "new language". Of course, it's just some groans of pain, or at most, it's not necessarily a few shouts based on pain. There are many people shouting, and it is not certain that any doctor will take you seriously and call you. But maybe I feel really a little pain, and the doctor will ignore it. That's because his old man is well-informed, ill and troubled, or has too many patients to be busy. Besides, a minor illness doesn't show the big picture of his old man's house, does it? But we can't just suffer. What if I accumulate a cancer in the future? So, we have to take our own medicine. Although you can't seek medical treatment indiscriminately, you might as well try the earth, folk remedies and ancestral secret recipes. It's better than waiting for death-how to say it, it's better than waiting. Then tell me about my earthwork: 3+2+ 1.
Say "three" first. "Three" refers to three "hearts": mentality, mind and soul. ......
............
The three "minds" mentioned above-mentality, mind and mind-are based on an open mind, focusing on stimulating the mind and tapping the mind to reflect the goal of "emotional attitude and values". Next, let's talk about two meanings in 3+2+ 1
A "meaning" is "poetry". . . . . .
The second meaning of "three hearts" and "two meanings" means "innovation" in teaching, which is called "creativity" in fashionable terms. I still think innovation is good, so I don't need so much pressure. ......
3+2+ 1, we talked about three "hearts" and two "meanings", which are to open up the mind, activate the mind, tap the mind, pay attention to poetry and painting, and embody new teaching concepts. Finally, add a foundation; Teachers' language literacy.
...... (unfinished)