First, although it is said that Zhu Yuanzhang was born as an emperor as a beggar, he is really cruel and disgusting. He set up a literary inquisition or something, killed many founding fathers and got a lot of criticism. Although Liu Bang has it, it is much milder. Personally, I feel that the development of the Han Dynasty is better than that of the Ming Dynasty, with a lot of democracy and economic development and many excellent emperors. At that time, it was a big country. The Ming Dynasty gave people the impression that it was dark and corrupt, and the assassinations of Jin Yiwei and Dongchang were hard and dark. This naturally reminds me of the founding emperor of the Han Dynasty.

Second, the history of Liu Bang and Xiang Yu's hegemony has aroused the research of historians from all walks of life. Life is like a play, a banquet at the Hongmen Gate, and Xiang Yu's self-immolation in Wujiang River. As well as the various plans and strategies of those ministers, are worth studying by many people. The history of the hegemony of the Chu River has also been more adapted into literary works. I've seen many people, I'm impressed, and I'm famous.