Is everything in Zhihu correct?
1. Is everything right in Zhihu? Is Zhihu's answer credible? In Zhihu's history, there are always extreme thoughts and particularly meticulous ones. Credible and untrustworthy. The so-called trustworthy, take its strengths. People who can't be trusted can't be trusted completely. Answering questions in Zhihu is my personal opinion on this issue, or I didn't meet certain requirements. When I answer, I always write down the solution to this matter and associate a method with others. The purpose is to compare various methods, what are the advantages to learn, improve their own shortcomings, and combine people's ideas, people's eyes are sharp. You must think for yourself. Use your own standards to measure other people's ideas.
2. Is everything in Zhihu correct? Is the answer on Zhihu reliable? In fact, it is a subjective answer to the question whether it is reliable or not, because there is only one in Zhihu. On the whole, it can't control the quality of content that isn't produced by itself, and many answers in Zhihu are subjective questions, so some questions may be useful in some people's eyes, but they are useless in some people's eyes, depending on whether you are reliable or not. Either way, there will be no phenomenon of only good and no bad. As long as it is edited by others, the quality of this post is certainly difficult to guarantee. No matter what kind of news media or personal official WeChat account, it will be "unreliable".
And as far as the current software push mechanism is concerned, most of what you see comes from what you usually pay attention to and observe, so what you see is actually what you want to see, or what you often see. And Zhihu, we can't deny that he can teach people a lot by spreading some knowledge, but it still has various mixed phenomena. As a software, he said that the above content can't be% correct, no matter who dares to make such a guarantee. So it is necessary for us to judge the quality of the content displayed above, because at present, there are many people in Zhihu who are promoting themselves in various ways. Therefore, when publishing an article, it is very likely that his content is biased. For example, his main function is to drain himself. In the process of answering questions, he actually wants to achieve a certain purpose, but we can't think that the answer in this case is not good. Moreover, some people are purely voluntary in the process of answering questions, and there are many such answers. We can't think that this unprofitable voluntary answer is necessarily good. We can only say that Zhihu does have a lot of content in all aspects, and the authenticity of the content, the quality of his answer, and whether it is reliable information need to be judged by ourselves.
3. Is everything in Zhihu correct? Why are there so many newspapers in Zhihu? It's really brilliant to see many answers on Zhihu. Zhihu began to answer questions from a professional niche website, with a relatively high starting point.
Why do you go to Zhihu so often? It's really brilliant to see many answers on Zhihu. In fact, there were many great people in the past, but compared with Zhihu, they were more concerned about the quality of questions and answers, rather than the business indicators such as page views, traffic and quantity, or the simplest word money. This may not matter to ordinary users, just pick any one and find an urgent answer. There is no hope, but for permanent high-quality respondents, watching a bunch of SQ irrigation robots ask questions all day is a tough torture and a sense of accomplishment. Zhihu, are all the answers true?
Making matters worse is the way to deal with it. What does Zhihu say?
On the one hand, I think money can replace the sense of accomplishment, and I use things like shopping malls to attract answers-as a result, I have more serious brush marks and robot questions and answers, and I have been smart enough to do them repeatedly in shopping malls, making it difficult for high-level respondents to really return.
On the other hand, the problem of expert certification and high quality in recent years has not attracted real experts (because they really don't want to spend money and are too lazy to take their qualifications seriously), but the exposure of tracing the three generations has scared away many people (who would believe that moral integrity gives you so much personal information). The so-called quality problem is even more funny. Instead of picking the quality of the question carefully (it should be selected by the machine), it puts all the responsibility on the respondent. There are a bunch of ridiculous format requirements and text requirements, and they must be manually authenticated by people who are not very good at it. Having said so many requirements, the respondents answered them themselves. I don't mean that I can pay a certain degree of attention like Zhihu, but I was thought of by a jp.
Generally speaking, Zhihu's success is a failure. Although in recent years, Zhihu has also suffered from the expansion of basic users and the decline in the overall quality of answering questions, it is hard to do worse in the basic framework and business philosophy (Sina Aiwen, which has closed down, is a minority, and others have closed down).
Is Zhihu's answer credible? Related content: Is Zhihu's answer credible? Share. After seeing Zhihu, is everything all right? I hope it will help everyone!