First of all, in this case, a city sports bureau is a public institution. Is the source of funds for this tender a financial subsidy? If so, it belongs to government procurement. Government procurement refers to the use of financial funds by state organs, institutions and organizations at all levels to purchase goods, projects and services within the scope of the centralized procurement catalogue formulated according to law or above the procurement limit standard.

1, the bidding enterprise is not qualified to bid; (The tenderer is a legal person or other organization. In other words, the tenderee in this case is the Municipal Sports Bureau, and the tender can be organized without qualification.

2. The tenderee is unfair and unfair in the bidding process.

3. Bidding enterprises bribe government officials and practice favoritism and malpractice;

4. The winning bidder does not meet the qualification requirements of the bidding enterprise;

5, the relevant departments deliberately delayed the announcement of the bid-winning notice; (Within 30 days after the bid evaluation, the purchaser shall determine the winning bidder. )

6. This tender requires samples to be brought to the site, including football, basketball stands, table tennis tables and other large equipment. The bidding enterprises produce samples according to the required parameters and transport them to the site, but the bidding project is not carried out according to the formal procedures, which has caused great losses of manpower, material resources, financial resources and time to bidding enterprises all over the country. (The bidding fee shall be borne by itself, and the regular bidding fee shall not be compensated. )

7, the second bid opening, the winning bidder has never had the ability and experience to operate basketball stands and other similar products; (Whether the successful bidder meets the performance requirements in the bidding documents)

8. Winning the bid at a very high price. Taking the basketball stand as an example, the bid-winning price of the second bid opening is as high as 8632 yuan per bid, which is far from the bidding quotation of other enterprises. (What is the bid evaluation method in the tender documents? Is it the lowest evaluated bid price method or the comprehensive evaluation method? Price is not the only criterion, but depends on the bid evaluation method in the bidding documents. )

9. The quality of the products provided by the winning bidder seriously does not meet the requirements of the tender; (Does the winning bidder's product meet the technical requirements in the bidding documents? )

10. It is puzzling that an unqualified enterprise won the bid in this bidding project and many previous bidding projects regardless of the price.

In the government procurement bidding, when the supplier thinks that his rights and interests have been damaged, he can question the purchaser in writing within 7 working days from the date when he knows that his rights and interests have been damaged. The contents of the inquiry include: bidding documents, bidding process and winning results. If the supplier is not satisfied with the reply given by the purchaser, he may complain to the procurement supervision and management department of the municipal government within 15 working days.