I think it is really thoughtless to say that "if an organization emphasizes attendance and punching, it must be in decline". This is simply a false topic without empirical evidence. Maybe it's just used to apply all units after seeing some of this phenomenon. This is what irresponsible people say. It takes a lot of data and arguments to prove a result, and only one negative example is needed to overthrow such a result.

In fact, I think this conclusion exists more in small companies. After all, the working atmosphere of small companies is relatively relaxed, and the personnel attendance system is also relatively relaxed. If one day the boss suddenly starts to emphasize attendance and punching, then I think it is very likely that the company is going downhill. Just like my first job was in a startup company, because it was a business job. At first, we didn't punch in at work and went out to run business. It was really free. Later, I suddenly asked to report to the company, but it didn't last long before the company declared bankruptcy.

My two brothers, one works in Huawei and the other in Ping An. For such a big company, work is very strict, and attendance and punching are completely sloppy. No matter who you are and how excellent you are, you must abide by the rules of the company. Once you violate the rules and regulations more than the number of times stipulated by the company, you are sure to be fired. It is such a company that emphasizes attendance and punching in every day. Their business volume is increasing year by year, not because it is going downhill.

Everyone should be responsible for what he says, and don't jump to conclusions about a phenomenon at will. When you weigh what you say repeatedly, you must also leave yourself a way out. In many cases, you have to explain it in different situations. Otherwise, you will also put yourself in an awkward position.