Emotion itself is a part of "objective facts" of "people". To exclude it is to take it out of context and "be an objective whole". This split view not only exposes the naivety of an armchair strategist, but also inevitably causes public protests, which ultimately hurts the recognition and authority of the law. Now/kloc-children aged 0/2 have mastered a lot of knowledge and information, including some legal knowledge. Many children know that they are still young, even if they kill someone, they will be fine. So you dare to do whatever you want!
It is the duty and responsibility of every citizen to correct the serious bad behavior of minors and prevent criminal behavior, which can effectively curb the serious impact on children's physical and mental health caused by the lack of family education and create a social environment conducive to protecting the safe and healthy growth of minors! I quite agree with this. Because of the development of society, people tend to be precocious with the development of the times, and the rule of law in the new era with developed network and information should also keep up with the trend of the times.
The law on the protection of minors is used to protect minors, not to protect minors from committing crimes. As long as it is illegal, it should not be protected by age. Shockingly, the suspect is under 13 years old, that is, 12 years old. After Yang's father called the police, after police analysis, he ruled out the possibility of being lost, picked up and trafficked, and filed a case for investigation as a murder case. Support Because parents of children nowadays are used to bad education without good moral character, campus violence is everywhere from primary school to high school. On the one hand, more people are hurt without using legal discretion to restrain them, on the other hand, it is not conducive to the development and stability of a harmonious society, and it is urgent to benefit the country and the people.