[Keynote Speech]

Read the following materials and write an article of not less than 800 words as required.

Some people say that failure is the mother of success. Some people say that success is the mother of failure, because proud success inevitably leads to failure.

Some people say that pride makes people lag behind. Some people say that pride makes people progress, because pride is a sign of self-confidence and can make people work hard.

From the perspective of innovation, whether "success is the mother of failure" or "pride makes people progress", it is a new idea to "play" the pipa without blindly following other people's views.

Please write an argumentative essay in this way. The requirements are well-founded, the topic is self-drawn, and plagiarism is not allowed.

Broken words

The so-called "playing the pipa" means "playing the devil's advocate" in plain English. "Anti-tune" is easy to sing, which makes people feel that "anti-tune" is "reasonable" but difficult. Therefore, on the basis of "singing the opposite tune", try to make the "opposite tune" justify itself. This is the key to writing this article well.

Material supermarket

1, modesty does not always make people progress, and sometimes it makes people fall behind; And pride doesn't necessarily make people lag behind, but sometimes it makes people progress.

-Don "Pride Makes People Progress"

2. The western motto is: Success is the mother of success. Have a little achievement, encourage; A little more progress and encouragement. For children, "pride" can also make people progress

-Don "Pride Makes People Progress"

There is a proverb in China: "A gentleman talks but doesn't do it." This ideology has had a long-term and strong influence on scholars and intellectuals in China. Because of this, everyone regards it as a shameful thing to start work and is ashamed to start work.

Now, China is learning from the West and making great efforts to develop science and technology. However, the concept of "gentlemen talk, villains talk" which has been cultivated for thousands of years is deeply rooted, and the tradition of despising hands-on remains in the bone marrow of China people.

Whether the foundation of China's future scientific and technological development can be established is directly related to whether the primary school students can develop the habit of loving hands-on and completely eliminate the psychology of despising hands-on.

-Sun Guanhan's philosophy of "a gentleman doesn't start work"

There is a gentle trap on the road of children's growth, which is dug by parents who protect their children too much. Children who fall into the trap are deprived of the opportunity to make mistakes and make corrections, thus losing the right to grow up.

-Xing Shu "Give the child another chance to fail"

5, the world knows that Meng Changjun can get scholars, scholars can return. The pawn got rid of the tiger and the wolf by his own strength. Ha ha! Meng Changjun is just the head of a crow and dog thieves' group, which can be said to be a wise man who received it! Otherwise, if you are strong, you will get a teacher. You should be able to control the Qin dynasty in the south, and you should also be able to use the power of chickens and dogs. With a cock crow, a dog thief came out of his door, and this man was not there.

-Wang Anshi's Reading the Biography of Meng Changjun

6. The arguer thinks that stealing symbols is a crime of believing in Ling Jun, but I think it is not enough to believe in Ling Jun.

-Tang Shunzhi's "New Rescue of Zhao"

7. The perfect wall of Lin Xiangru, which everyone calls it, is unbelievable.

-Wang Shizhen's "Lin Xiangru returned to Zhao intact"

8. Autumn has been sad and lonely since ancient times. I say autumn is better than spring. A crane crossed the clouds in the clear sky, and Bixiao was proud of it.

-Liu Yuxi's autumn poems

9. It is advisable to pursue hard and not learn from bullies.

-Mao Zedong's "People's Liberation Army Occupy Nanking"

[breakthrough in thinking]

(train of thought design 1) from the sentence "where there is a will, there is a way" leads to "anti-tune": "where there is a will, there is a way." Through case analysis and famous sayings and epigrams, it is proved that only by combining lofty ideals with practical actions can "things" be "accomplished"

(2) Conceptual design: "Don't shoot when it's time to shoot" From a lyric of the theme song "Hao Han Ge" of the TV series "Water Margin" combined with specific examples, it is proved that some people have killed people and violated the law, but they have done bad things with good intentions. Furthermore, it expounds the principle of strengthening the concept of legal system and "think twice before you act"

(3) Thinking design: Xunzi's famous saying "Perseverance can carve a stone" in Perseverance: "Perseverance is not necessarily a stone to carve." Combined with the analysis of specific examples, if we don't pay attention to the method of "carving", we will never achieve the goal of "one hammer in the east and one stick in the west" Then it is concluded that the spirit of "perseverance" and the scientific method of "carving" can only carve through the stone.

(4) Thinking design: From the affirmation of Gou Jian's destruction of Wu recorded in Guoyu, it leads to "anti-tune": Gou Jian is a "tyrant" who can only "* * * suffer" and cannot "share joys and sorrows". The latter can be proved by his actions of forcing Wen Zi to die and driving Fan Li away.

[Boutique Corridor]

Model essay 1

Success is not necessarily a hero.

-Excerpt from "Goujian Destroys Wu"

Gou Jian in Guoyu has always been praised by people. People praised him not only because he was ambitious, but also because he silently prepared for the country's rejuvenation after the demise of Yue. Moreover, because he had the last laugh in the process of fighting for hegemony with the king of Wu, he destroyed Wu and achieved the cause of hegemony. The latter is the decisive factor.

In China, when it comes to history and historical figures, the winner is always the king and the loser is the enemy. In Lu Xun's words, "He who wins the world is king, and he who wins the world is not a thief". Even if you are born a street rogue, people, especially the so-called "historians", will still look at you with new eyes when you "grab the world" and secure the throne of the emperor. Your tall image was established at once. On the other hand, even if you are knowledgeable, people, especially those "historians", will naturally put you in another book when you "can't grab the world" and the hero is at the end. You are either a gangster or a bandit.

China people's historical view of "judging heroes by success or failure" is quite biased. Take Gou Jian as an example. He tried his best to destroy Wu, and these achievements cannot be erased. However, it would be ridiculous to use these so-called "successes" to build a "hero" archway for him. As long as this part of the excerpt is removed a little, we can see that he is a narrow-minded "villain" who is only bitter and unhappy after Wu's demise. Fortunately, I recognized my "villain" nature long ago and retired in time after Wu's death, avoiding the same fate of the genre. From this point of view, even if Gou Jian is a "hero", it is not in the true sense, and at least half of the discount is required.

The theory of success or failure in China's history not only shaped Gou Jian into a semi-hero, but also shaped Liu Bang into a pseudo-hero. Liu bang is a street scoundrel with extremely bad conduct. Before Peixian started the war, he was just a punk, refusing to pay for drinking and paying his debts. But because he defeated Xiang Yu with intrigue in the Chu-Han War, the Han Dynasty was established. His bad behavior as a child will be written off by history. It is ridiculous to talk about heroes by success or failure.

Winners are not necessarily heroes, and there are many real husbands among losers. Xiang Yu is a typical representative in this respect. Xiang Yu not only has superb martial arts, but also attaches great importance to the friendship between friends. At the Hongmen banquet, he gave up an excellent opportunity to get rid of Liu Bang, because he valued the friendship with Liu Bang against Qin and could not bear to kill each other. Such an indomitable hero, a real hero, was despised by "historians" because he was finally defeated by Liu Bang.

Therefore, when we evaluate history and historical figures, we must adhere to the principle of seeking truth from facts, and we cannot judge heroes by success or failure.

[opinion]

First of all, in view of the disadvantages of China's historical view, this paper puts forward the view that "success is not necessarily a hero", which meets the requirements of "playing the pipa" and has innovative significance in argument.

As an argumentative essay, the part that puts forward the viewpoint at the beginning of this paper seems to be a little cumbersome, but it is deliberately cumbersome, aiming at laying the foundation for the analysis of the following examples. "Grab the world" refers to Liu Bang below, and "Can't grab the world" naturally refers to Xiang Yu below.

The three examples cited in this paper (Gou Jian, Liu Bang and Xiang Yu) form a relationship of two opposites and one positive. Through the comparative analysis of these positive and negative examples, the necessity of not judging heroes by success or failure is further clarified.

Fan Wen 2

Parents' "cruel" is meaningful.

In the park, a young couple is holding a toddler. Suddenly, the child fell down and couldn't get up crying. He wants his parents to help him. The young couple were unmoved and smiled and said to the child, "Get up when you fall."

From a secular point of view, this young couple is "cruel" to their children. But in my opinion, behind this "cruelty" is the good intention of parents to expect their children to face difficulties and setbacks bravely.

On the road of children's growth, it is inevitable to fall several times, to be frustrated several times, and to be unlucky several times. Parents must first let their children face all this calmly. Shakespeare said, "Nothing can temper a person's character like bad luck." Liang Qichao also said: "Suffering and hardship is the highest school to temper personality." A few falls, setbacks and even bad luck are nothing. On the contrary, they are excellent opportunities to temper people's will and exercise their endurance. If you can't even bear a few bumps, setbacks and bad luck, how can you stand in society when you grow up? The first meaning conveyed by the cruelty of young parents is that falling is inevitable in the process of learning to walk. It's okay to fall down. Only by turning over a few more somersaults can we realize the hardships of life and face them calmly.

On the road of children's growth, we need to rely on some external objective conditions, such as the support of parents, the help of friends, the help of teachers and so on. But the most important thing is your own efforts. When a child falls to the ground or encounters difficulties or setbacks, the best way is to let the child stand up again, overcome difficulties and resolve setbacks through his own efforts, and "get up after falling". If I fall, I will pin my hopes on others to help me get up. I depend on others for everything. How to live independently in society when you grow up? The second meaning conveyed by the cruelty of young parents is: if you fall, you must get up by your own efforts, and don't pin your hopes on the help of others. Climb a few more times, and you will know how to get up by yourself, and you will know how to exert your subjective initiative to overcome difficulties.

However, in real life, we find that more "kind-hearted" parents try their best to create a comfortable living environment for their children. Some things that should be handled by their children themselves have also been "arranged" by their parents. Raising children like "weak seedlings in the greenhouse" gives children the inertia of relying on others (parents at home, teachers at school, friends in society) for everything. Its harm to children's growth cannot be underestimated.

May our society have more "cruel" parents and less "kind" parents.

[opinion]

The child fell, and the parents didn't help him, but let him stand up by himself. How should we evaluate such parents? The overall evaluation is "cruel". However, the author disagrees with this evaluation, thinking that it is the good intention of parents to expect their children to face setbacks and adversity bravely. This is consistent with the requirement of "playing the pipa".

This paper mainly reveals the meaning of parents' cruelty, and analyzes it from two aspects: cultivating children's endurance and cultivating children's self-reliance ability. These two aspects constitute a gradual logical connection.

Comparing "cruel" parents with "kind" parents in reality and analyzing the harm of "kind" parents are not idle, but carefully designed out of the profundity of discussion. With it, the pertinence and practical significance of the article will be stronger.