Because it is the first class, I will say some digressions to stimulate students' learning initiative. The effect is still there. About 1/3 of the students in the class listen and answer questions according to their ideas. This ratio is good, and there are several problems that need to be improved:

1. Ideological mobilization is a bit long, followed by examples around. If it is better to cooperate with social celebrities, this is still not ideal.

2. There are not many knowledge points. It is necessary to be very clear about which knowledge points are and concentrate the knowledge points, because the class hours are limited;

3. The process of students' participation in the classroom should be redesigned. Take the concept of competitive sports as an example, show pictures-students are learning to answer questions-ask students to explain their reasons for choosing-show the concept, remember the key points-and then choose again-teachers and students. This process can be optimized as follows: show pictures-students are learning to answer questions-find a few students to explain the reasons for their choices-publish discussions, and all students write down the reasons for their choices-show answers-show concepts-let students find the core points-strengthen the knowledge points of concepts compared with what they have just understood-and then choose teachers and students. That is, add a student to discuss before and after showing the concept. Let the students draw their own conclusions, not the teacher.

Advantages:

? The selected content should be challenging and attract students' attention. The picture chosen today is very good, which has aroused the enthusiasm of students and is quite successful.

? The core of "student-centered" is to guide and inspire students more and let them participate, rather than cramming. Remember the important point: "Ask more questions".