Luckin Coffee fraud case reached a settlement of $65.438+$80 million, and fraud needs to bear legal responsibility. Although such things need to bear legal responsibility, if the two sides reach a settlement, there is no need for the law to do anything. So for such a thing, it is best if the two sides can reach a settlement. For Luckin Coffee, in fact, such a thing is that they didn't do it first, but each of us also benefited. Perhaps their situation is not particularly good for such things, but what we need to know is that we have not benefited so much. For Credit Suisse Coffee, what they are talking about is getting capital, and capital is invested in their funds, which is the money they earn. For us, it is more about enjoying service.

Sometimes I think Credit Suisse Bank coffee is actually quite good. They not only improve our understanding of coffee. Let us know that coffee is not a luxury, and everyone can buy or enjoy coffee at a low price. So for such a life, I think it is more of an improvement in the quality of life that WeChat has given us.

Every company may have its own system, but for companies like Ruixing, what they do is not for us ordinary people to make money. We ordinary people just want to make money for capital.

So many times I think Ruixun is still a conscientious enterprise, but now it may not be so good for us, and it may be a loss for us. Then, for Luckin Coffee's $654.38+80 million fraud case, it is actually necessary to bear the legal responsibility for fraud, but his legal responsibility is also negative, because he reached a settlement of $654.38+80 million.