It is customary to say that there are always some people who are diligent, and there are always some people who will become lazy. Usually, diligent people serve lazy people.

Does this statement make sense?

Looking around, a family or a unit is really like this.

For example, at home, there is always at least one family member who is particularly worried about being diligent and capable, taking care of housework and being responsible for eating, drinking, washing and brushing a small family. Others can choose to do nothing, which is also the existence of peace of mind.

This is understandable, because of family culture, one is willing to fight and one is willing to suffer. It may not be good to do housework often, because I am used to receiving services.

The same is true at work.

You can also see that when a task falls to a unit or a department, there are always a small number of people who act as old oxen and rush to the forefront from beginning to end, contracting all the hard work.

Where are the others? Quite a few people have to do the work next to them, while others have to put it off when they can, which has nothing to do with themselves. To tell you the truth, it still gives you face.

What about the rest? They are usually disdainful people, but at the same time there is nothing they can do.

The performance characteristics of this kind of race are that the unit or department is indifferent to everything, and there are many good things from others. The biggest feature is that he is also thick-skinned, enjoying the fruits of other people's labor, and there is no embarrassment and shame in his heart. On the contrary, it is particularly calm, let alone grateful.

As a result, everyone has formed such a fixed cognition that diligent people serve lazy people.

Of course, at this point, someone will definitely stand up and point out that there must be problems with the rules and regulations of the unit or the employment mechanism. We can't refute this, but there is nothing we can do. It can be said that this attribution is beyond the scope of our discussion.

Similarly, we don't need to make a moral judgment and point fingers at them, saying that they are parasites and vampires. We can only analyze and judge from psychological activities.

Let's talk about the so-called "hardworking people" first. In fact, they are not the kind of people who naturally love their work and can't be idle. After receiving the task, having a sense of responsibility means trying to overcome all difficulties and not leaving your work on the ground because you can't stand it. You can understand that this is a valuable work quality and responsibility.

Even if lofty morality is excluded, it is an obligation to proceed from the minimum professional ethics. If others don't do it, someone has to do it, right? You can also understand it as "have to".

As a result, the so-called lazy people take advantage of the "unbearable" of hardworking and kind people. They can cheat and play tricks unscrupulously, because they know that the sky will not fall, and even if it does, someone will hold it, which is none of their business, and it is even more impossible to be held accountable.

You see, the same thing, what you see is definitely different from what lazy people see.

Therefore, hard-working and kind people, to a certain extent, it is your compromise, tolerance and obedience that fatten their courage and encourage their insatiable greed. Coupled with the current situation of overstaffed people, a vicious circle of bad money driving out good money has been formed.

Therefore, you will see that the work will always be done by a few people and will never be finished. In the end, the leaders may not necessarily recognize it. People who don't work will never get close. People are still having fun, and even shout-you are not very capable, come on.

"What can you do? Come on "is another wonderful logic that we will talk about next.

To give a common example, for example, if you write well, you will often undertake some tasks that are often copied, and the reason is even more impressive. Who told you to write well?

What nonsense logic is this! Oh, good calligraphy should serve you? Does this mean that I deserve this skill? Then I'm good at spending money, too Why don't you let me help you with the flowers?

Isn't that the same as working? Oh, just because your ability has been recognized, come on, if you can, please do more! What wonderful logic is this? Why let those who can do more work do it? Why can't you try harder to be an all-round person?

Therefore, "those who can do more work" is another old saying with ulterior motives, similar to the poison released by "diligent people are slaves to lazy people"

Think again, how many such evil old sayings are there?