There are also many people who ask whether it is effective not to eat staple food for dinner. Of course there is. Just stick to it for a month and lose a few pounds.
I don't know if you have noticed, but it is not recommended to eat staple food for dinner, which means brunch is still necessary. Basically, it won't make you completely stop eating rice, pasta and other foods.
We know that cereals and root foods can not only provide calories for human body, but also provide rich dietary fiber, minerals and vitamins, which are necessary for our life.
There used to be a saying that if you eat high-protein food for a long time and don't eat staple food at all, on the one hand, your body may cause constipation because you don't eat enough dietary fiber. On the other hand, it is not good for intestinal health. Plus, if you don't eat rice and pasta at all, it means that you will eat a lot of protein and protein, which are animals and plants. If your source is mostly animal protein, it may lead to an increase in cholesterol, which is very unfavorable to the cardiovascular system. So basically this diet is not suitable for long-term operation.
So if you just choose not to eat the staple food for dinner, that meal can reduce the calorie intake by 200 to 300 calories, and other calories will not reach that big (maybe eating more meat, fish and vegetables can only increase the calorie of 100 calories). That meal can reduce the calorie intake by 200 calories, which will certainly help you lose weight, right? In addition, if you eat this kind of rice flour for breakfast and lunch, you don't have to worry about insufficient dietary fiber intake. Isn't it a good thing to kill two birds with one stone?
Then after a period of not eating the staple food for dinner, you feel that the speed of losing weight is slowly decreasing. Then at this time, you can make more use of the increase of dietary fiber to speed up the fat reduction, and choose coarse grains rich in dietary fiber instead of refined white rice pasta for brunch.