The above situation should belong to general tort liability, and the principle of imputation of fault liability in Article 6 of the Tort Liability Law should be applied. It can be seen from the case that the relationship between the overall behavior of Party A and Party B and the damage of Party C conforms to the constitutive requirements of tort liability and should belong to the category of general tort.

In this case, B is the direct infringer, causing damage to C through his own jumping behavior. Therefore, it should bear tort liability. A's negligent behavior is the direct cause of B's trip, so it should constitute behavior with B's trip. According to tort law? Article 2 stipulates that both of them constitute negligence infringement and bear joint and several liability.