Grasp the degree and quantity: what the ancients valued most was the wisdom of life. Such an imprecise sentence can only be taken out of context. If you read the whole article, I believe the conclusion is definitely not like this. The ancients paid attention to health preservation and would consider it from the degree and quantity. Ancient wine is also very different from our current industrial wine. Mostly rice wine or fruit wine. Coupled with the control of quantity, it will have a good effect on different people. This should be easy to understand now. Alcoholism and alcoholism have actually been opposed since ancient times. Even Genghis Khan, the master of nomadic people, once banned alcohol in the army, so the ancients thought that drinking for health was definitely not good.
Modern people think that drinking is harmful to health, which seems more interesting. With the development of science and technology, our cognition of many things is being adjusted. We can't simply and absolutely judge whether wine is good or bad for human beings because of the benefits brought by food diversity and ecological balance. Of course, fake wine is definitely harmful. This is no problem. We can't say that wine is harmful because of fake wine, but even good wine, grain wine and fruit wine should be controlled.
How many wineries are there in China, how many people drink, and how many people say that "drinking is harmful to health"? It's ridiculous to think about it, just like smoking is harmful to health. How many people can quit smoking? Although I don't drink myself, I don't think moderate drinking will harm my health. I just think there are too many fake wines now, so there is no need to take the risk to drink them.
Wine culture is also a traditional culture in China. We should not simply understand it as an opposition to the present. In fact, many conclusions of the ancients were summarized from life. Although they have not been scientifically demonstrated by us yet, it cannot be said that they are contrary to all our conclusions now. Some of them are different because times have changed and the environment has changed. There were not many people who could consume wine in ancient times, and the brewing technology at that time was different from now, and there were not so many fake wines.
Drinking should be a personal cognitive problem. As long as the quantity is well controlled, after all, the country has not banned the production of wine, which means that it is still necessary to exist. what do you think? Welcome to leave a message, thank you!