Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Health preserving recipes - TVB's new drama "White Strongman 2" was launched, and netizens commented differently. What are the disadvantages?
TVB's new drama "White Strongman 2" was launched, and netizens commented differently. What are the disadvantages?
Personally, I think one of the highlights of White Man 2 is the continuation of the debate about medical ethics in the previous work. In fact, this is not uncommon in all medical TV dramas. After all, this is the most common contradiction except the emotional line of stomachache. However, as a TV series in recent years, "White Strongman" can take medical ethics as the main line, which I think is quite commendable.

"White strongman 2" revolves around two drafts: "medical reform" and "policy of fully opening drug names". In fact, this idea is very close to reality, because modern medical ethics is different from early western medical ethics, and a series of moral problems brought about by the development of contemporary biomedical science and technology can no longer be simply dealt with by moral principles and norms based on the deontology of early western medical ethics. When the traditional category of medical ethics is impacted by knowledge economy, people's fundamental views on health and life are also linked with economy, so it is necessary to introduce value philosophy into the field of medical ethics. Facing the moral confusion brought by medical progress, we must weigh the advantages and disadvantages of morality and make a reasonable value judgment.

The white strongman series has put a lot of thought into this aspect. Modern medical ethics advocates reasonable economic interests under the principle of humanitarianism and service purposes based on utilitarianism. In the first medical reform, Yang wanted to reform public hospitals and let them share it, and finally overturned his own draft because he saw through the essence of short-term speculative capital. I think that's the reason. In fact, people have to think of some debates that have happened in history. /kloc-a master of classical liberalism in the 20th century, critically inherited Mill, the founder of British utilitarianism, and overestimated human nature in Utilitarianism, which was refuted by Stephen, a criminal jurist, in his book Freedom, Equality and Fraternity. Of course, there are Saint-Simon Doctrine and Comte Daoism, but they are beyond the scope of discussion. As Teacher Luo said, it is what fraternity depends on. In Stephen's view, the only rationality of fraternity lies in its profound belief background, but humanism cuts off the root of this belief, so this shallow humanistic belief will inevitably bring disastrous consequences. Love corresponds to hate. Without hatred, love is incomprehensible. However, there is heaven and hell in Christianity, and there is God's anger and love for mankind. If people don't understand God's hatred of human sins, they can't understand the love doctrine that the son of God died as a scapegoat instead of human beings. Stephen believes that utilitarianism must have the cornerstone of faith and eternal hope, otherwise utilitarianism will definitely move towards vulgar utilitarianism that refuses to transcend and blooms evil flowers.

Therefore, the first part focuses on the combination of public welfare theory and life value theory, which has become an important foundation of contemporary western ethics. The theory of life value advocates using the value of life to measure the meaning of life existence, and emphasizes the contribution of life to others, society and mankind. Of course, there are human capital theory and risk trading theory. The theory of public welfare is based on the interests of human beings and society, so that the limited medical and health resources can be distributed and used more reasonably, which is more in line with the interests of most people. This is what the medical development bureau, represented by Dr. Wen, talks about every day in the play. Modern medicine has changed the one-to-one relationship between doctors and patients in traditional medicine and socialized medical undertakings, which requires the government to rationally allocate medical resources in the whole society and meet everyone's health care rights, which is also the core of the whole drama.

Back to the plot, the second film certainly left a deep impression on me. It inherited the professional and immersive surgical scenes of the first film, as well as ethical issues such as foxes and stabbing charges written by the ancient Greek poet Archilock. The RIP that appeared at the beginning has directly pointed out the core of the second part. Of course, some anchors die every day and finally really send themselves away, but the development of emotional lines is really chaotic, and I really can't understand it. Look forward to the follow-up development.