Modern excellent Chinese medicine books
1. Five Books on Chinese and Western Medicine (written by Zonghai, Tang Rongchuan, Sichuan)
2. The typhoid fever is slight, and the golden chamber is slight (written by Cao in Huaiyin, Jiangsu)
3. Treatise on Febrile Diseases has a new meaning, and Synopsis of the Golden Chamber has a new meaning (Yu Wuyan)
4. Single-point treatment options (people's health)
5. Disease Prediction (Yang Li, Beijing Science Press)
6. A Record of Classic Prescription Experiments (Jiang).
7. Acupuncture was compiled by Yang Jizhou in Ming Dynasty.
1: The ancients did not study today's textbooks of prescription and traditional Chinese medicine, but they were rigorous. -
2. The real four classics are typhoid fever, golden chamber, Neijing and Benjing (Shennong Herbal Classic). There are no classics in the four books and five classics that everyone has studied now, and they are replaced by Treatise on Febrile Diseases. ^
3. Let's look at Zhongjing, Shuhe, Sun Zhenren and the four great masters. They talk about pharmacology, all based on classics. -and the classic is one of the four real classics. Everyone's teacher, from the beginning of the teacher, changed the classic into Treatise on Febrile Diseases as the four classics. Therefore, it is meaningless for everyone to read the "Counseling Classics for Monarch and Minister" now-the real meaning of the Counseling Classics for Monarch and Minister lies in the classic T.
4: rigorous? Rigorous? ! After studying for a few days, you dare to say that the textbooks of Prescription and Traditional Chinese Medicine are rigorous. Since I was a teacher for everyone, I have made mistakes in four books and five classics. What is rigor? A famous doctor in ancient times, even Ye was a man, watching him talk about pharmacology. Did he start with the classics? You have to be a strict doctor, you haven't even seen the real classics! Or study the classics! r & lt*n|
5: Some people may think that I am attacking everyone, but I am not. The four classics have been tampered with, indicating that everyone has been hurt. It is wrong to be a teacher from the beginning, and it is getting farther and farther away from the real famous doctor. From the beginning of the teacher, we were not strict with classics, and everyone was cheated.
Since no one has found a correct way to understand drugs, let's take a look at the prescription. What's the difference between classics and times? Classic prescriptions may seem unremarkable, but they are actually very useful. As long as you understand it well, the prescriptions in synopsis of the golden chamber and treatise on febrile diseases will be enough for a lifetime. We should start with classics, but the real meaning of classic prescriptions is hard to understand —— Mo Qiang's guess. Where is the time? It is also very easy to use, easy to understand, and seems to be very useful to use, but the mechanism of prescription is superficial, and almost all of them specialize in treating diseases. Of course, there are also very classic prescriptions in the prescription, which cannot be generalized, but most of them are superficial and not as "intriguing" as the classic prescriptions. At present, the textbooks of Prescription Science are more "emphasizing time than classics" in quantity, so from the beginning of teachers, the use of prescriptions is becoming more and more superficial-how many have really recovered? Chinese and western medicine are always combined. If the ancients were like this, people would have died long ago. Therefore, the abandonment of the classics and the neglect of prescriptions make Chinese medicine more and more superficial and less rigorous.
7. Talk about Treatise on Febrile Diseases and the Four Classics. The four books are classic because all doctors have to read them. The ancients paid attention to learning sects, but the four books were really the result of various sects. Everyone has a different understanding of the four classics. Over time, there are different schools. Because of this, Chinese medicine has developed-febrile diseases are just a big branch. Nowadays, people are not interested in classics. Instead of reading classics, they read febrile diseases first. They no longer study classical prescriptions, but pay more and more attention to prescriptions. They also use the "science and technology" of western medicine to measure the medicinal properties and pharmacology. Is it the way out for Chinese medicine? \6
8: Everyone likes Treatise on Febrile Diseases, which is very good. But the real "rare edition" treatise on febrile diseases is "Guilin ancient edition treatise on febrile diseases" Guilin ancient books had a large number of typhoid fever categories before "solar disease, pulse floating", which is the real essence. There are many general outlines in Cheng Wuji Ben, including chapters on pulse identification and pulse smoothing, but the general outline in Guilin Guben is more than twice as much as this. Since the Ren Yingqiu Conference, we have abandoned this principle and sought the last one. Everyone's teachers learn typhoid fever, mostly from the beginning of "sun disease, pulse floating", and know little about the general outline of typhoid fever-equivalent to learning only the general outline of Treatise on Febrile Diseases. Everyone is even worse-the result of blind combination of traditional Chinese and western medicine is that there is no time to learn the real principle of Treatise on Febrile Diseases. There is the dregs of studying hard before the exam, which makes everyone worse than everyone's teacher-even Liu Lihong only learned half of typhoid fever! Mr Liu Lihong hopes that everyone should read more classic books, which is correct. I think if we really want to strictly demand Chinese medicine, we should not only read more classics, but also read more good classics-not all ancient books are "classics"