So victims usually go to the store, and the store will send you away on the grounds that you won't return it after selling it, or that you can return it casually after buying something. The victim may not be able to return the card because of poor speech or poor communication.
In fact, this whole scam can be divided into two parts. One is the legal basis for explaining whether the card contract is valid and whether it is reasonable to ask for a refund. One is whether the behavior of the store asking you to apply for a card is criminal fraud or civil fraud.
First, if we simply sue the merchant to cancel the service contract, then after a prosecution period of about one year, we have a high probability of winning the case and asking the store for a refund, because we have the right to ask the store to return this intangible paid service to us, no matter according to Article 1 10 of the Contract Law or Article 26 of the Consumer Protection Law, we don't even have to bear the so-called card refund fee in the store. But this kind of circulation and energy consumption is unbearable for most victims.
Secondly, it is really difficult to define whether the behavior in the store is criminal fraud or civil fraud, because the store did provide you with massage services, and the store is willing to continue to provide services, indicating that it does not have the purpose of illegal possession. Moreover, the store probably didn't give you a clear promise in that respect at the beginning, and most people probably deleted the chat records because they were cheated or afraid of being discovered by their families. So many times we don't have enough evidence to prove that they are criminal frauds.
Many victims may complain through the 123 15 consumer hotline, but this consumer hotline can only mediate and has no law enforcement power against the merchants. Therefore, in many cases, the deterrent to merchants is not enough, which leads to merchants not caring about these complaints.