With this question, the author searched the relevant information on the internet, and many data on the internet showed: the incident of document fraud.
It turned out that just a few days after the Lantern Festival in 2009, the People's Daily reporter published "The true age of Wen? Articles such as "The Absurd Life of the Master of Chinese Studies" exposed a series of untrue stories of Wen, and a stone stirred up a thousand waves, which were reprinted by major media. Netizens from all over the world have speculated and commented on this incident, and various articles about Wen have appeared in the media, countless.
Wen's real age? The article "The Absurd Life of the Master of Chinese Studies" mainly focuses on Wen's age, special age experience and honorary title. Master of Chinese studies, master of literature and history, master of Chu ci? Waiting for questioning, waiting for proof. Wen claimed to be born in 19 10, so he was called 2009? Centenarians? . However, after investigating relevant materials, AARON Li found that the birth time of the articles on the first list of People's Literature Publishing House was1922; The filling time of China National Theatre is 192 1 year 1 month15; Wen was 43 years old when he was reeducated through labor in February 1963.
Therefore, AARON Li thinks that Wen's actual age at that time should be about 1 1 year younger than centenarians, that is to say, Wen was born around 192 1 year instead of191year. On the retirement form of China Youth Art Theatre, the column of Wen's date of birth shows:1921.15, and the date of signing the form is 198 1 year. There is also a report that China Youth Art Theatre agreed to give lectures in the Soviet Union: Wen, a retired cadre of our college, was born on 192 1 year 1 month 15. Therefore, Wen's real age is a mystery.
This paper questioned Wen's experience in a special era, and thought that Wen was labeled as a fugitive in 1966 for publicly speaking ill of Jiang Qing, which led to Wen's imprisonment. This later flattered Wen and made Wen a success? Villains? . The truth of the matter is that Wen was imprisoned on the charge that he committed another crime in 1963, was classified as a bad element, and was expelled from public office for reeducation through labor. Is this the real text? WG experience? .
As for Wen? Master of Chinese studies? The title of the book is mainly because Wen worked in a publishing house before and published some books written by himself, such as Qu Yuan Ji and Old History. But in fact, these books were not written by Wen, but just compiled by him. Moreover, there are still some problems in the annotated books, such as painless grammar and incoherent translation. In addition, Wen Huaisha claimed to be a disciple of Zhang Taiyan, which was also questioned by the world.
Regarding his academic level, Mr. Tang, a true disciple of Zhang Taiyan, mentioned Wen in his letter to Tang 1988, which probably means that many people are willing to make big announcements to improve their fame without any academic achievements. I object to this. You mentioned it? Shakespeare? It should refer to the text, the level is average. How dare you compare with Guo Moruo just by translating a few articles by Qu Yuan?
On the level of Wen Huaisha, the writer Mao Dun put forward his own views. 1977 Wang Dehou, a researcher of Lu Xun, sent a new interpretation of Lu Xun's old poems to Mao Dun and asked him how he wrote them. Mao Dun is very rigorous in his studies. He studied the book in detail for more than a month and wrote to Wang Dehou about it. The person who wrote this book has a poor ability to understand Lu Xun's poems, which can be said to be completely incomprehensible. ? This river flows eastward day and night? what's up Notes? He is puzzling, and there are many other sentences? News? Not coming out. Therefore, I boldly guess that this person is a liar. In order to deceive people, this book tries to force some literary and art circles to support it. In the final analysis, it is cheating. ?
Even Mao Dun, a great scholar, said so. It seems that Wen's academic level is really not so good.
When Wen's fraudulent behavior was exposed, various media responded one after another. Zhu, a cultural scholar, said in an interview that his doubts represent the views of many old people in the literary world on Wen. As early as the 1980s, he had heard many rumors about Wen, but everyone laughed it off at that time. But I didn't know, China? Master? More and more, intensified. Therefore, Zhu thinks: the exposed falsification incident is actually a literary world? Cleaning the door? Action. Although AARON Li's article is a bit extreme, it can help people to reflect on the present situation of China culture. Help to solve the cultural myth of the real master and restore it? People? True colors; And expose those fake masters, so that they have no way out.
Look at the comments of netizens on Wen in those years: I suddenly found that Wen is a master of Chinese studies, but he turned out to be a liar. I am very puzzled. I am really angry, cheating the world and stealing the name! AARON Li exposed it well, promptly, rationally and forcefully, and supported it! I have read his book about Chu Ci before. It's thin and not so good. How did it become? Master of Chinese studies? Probably the current style of writing is grandiose.
Most of these comments are people who think Wen is a cultural liar. Master of Chinese studies? Under the banner of "eat more fat, drink more, make more friends with the opposite sex, and live to at least ninety-nine". There is a story that Wen had a boil on his hand and had to have an operation.
The doctor who performed the operation asked two nurses to come in and inject Wen with anesthetic. Wen saw two beautiful little nurses and said, don't give me an anesthetic You two are so beautiful. When you are in surgery, I will stare at you and appreciate your beauty, so that I can forget the pain, okay? ? This matter is shared by the media, not invented by the media. Its purpose is to instill in others his way of keeping in good health.
Is Wen really? Master of Chinese studies? Or? Cultural liar? He died on 20 18. His academic level can no longer deceive the world. Although a series of traditional cultures he preached seem reasonable, we still need to treat him dialectically. The length of a person's life lies not in how many health lectures he listens to, but in whether he is wonderful in live high, rather than whether everyone can become what we need. Master? But there are really knowledgeable people.