The first sentence, "I won't support it as long as I have one more class", instantly drove the atmosphere of the audience and smoothly entered the debate in my own fiery rhythm.

Argument 1: The content of the love class determines that students can't say what they really want to hear, and they can't listen to what they can say, which is meaningless.

Argument 2: There is no uniform standard for love, but class will have a negative effect on love.

Argument 3: Students often hate a class because they hate a teacher. If the teacher is disgusting in the love class, it will lower their expectations in love.

Argument 4: The love class can't be effectively assessed, the written examination is easy to become an armchair strategist, and the practice of falling in love in front of the invigilator is also embarrassing, which is wrong.

Argument 5: Love classes must create stereotypes in love, and analyze and study the potential love objects in different categories, which reduces the pure inner feelings (singing a poem on the spot to strengthen the argument)

Xiaohe's performance today is worthy of the choice of letting him come back in the audition. When editing many teammates' attention and discussion about him, he had a hunch that he was going to advance first, but he didn't expect Xiaohe's performance to be so powerful. The five arguments were all discussed with highlights and paragraphs in one go, and the scene was extremely hot. After a debate, I got 43 votes, which directly pulled my close opponent to a high of 92. Beautiful!

I support the view that love is a compulsory course in pressure reducing valve universities.

Argument 1: Understanding love knowledge is just what college students need. If the university does not offer compulsory courses, students will study by themselves, but the materials used for self-study are not standardized (novels, TV dramas, online texts, asking radio anchors), which is easy to help.

Argument 2: Compulsory courses can teach you some basic knowledge, avoid bad love relationship and self-protection after injury, and avoid negative effects such as jumping off a building, not being able to walk out and doubting yourself after falling out of love.

Argument 3: the course of love will come sooner or later, why not come in the compulsory course of college?

First round opening, pressure reducing valve VS black

Xiaohe: Did the university teacher teach you to make the atmosphere so sad?

Pressure reducing valve: This is what reality teaches us. (rhetorical question) If you don't support the compulsory course of love, what compulsory course do you support?

Xiaohe: College students choose their own majors. It doesn't matter to me what I choose (rhetorical question). It is easy for them to get into trouble when they study by themselves. Won't the university teacher help?

Gray: This is much more reliable than those who call themselves love experts in society. After all, it is more professional. (Turning to the topic of compulsory courses) The compulsory love course may be a public compulsory course, which has nothing to do with what major you choose.

Xiaohe: Do you think dating can be learned in college?

I don't support Feng Xiaotong's compulsory love course.

Refutation: Refute Gray's theory of lovelorn suicide. If you are lovelorn, you may commit suicide and start a compulsory course, which is too serious for a compulsory course in college.

Parameters:

Argument 1: Leave the university teacher alone. University teachers are doctors, who devote their youth to academics. Usually, they are not married. How do they teach others to fall in love?

Argument 2: Leave college students alone. Love is an extracurricular activity, but it will become boring after it becomes compulsory.

Argument 3: The most important thing in love is sincerity, not that learning is better than not learning well. What's the point of learning a little fur to fall in love and becoming a routine?

Argument 4: Love is not a compulsory course in life, how can it become a compulsory course in college? Good love is a luxury in life. If you insist on making it a necessity, you will only get a fake.

I support the compulsory course of love in Wang University.

Argument 1: The love lessons learned in the fake classes of these romantic novels and TV plays are too unreliable. (Brother Lei actually said this, but the variety show of the king is extremely strong, with vivid language, limbs and live performances as auxiliary arguments, and its appeal has reached several levels. )

Argument 2: The biggest scam in love is actually self-made. People with low self-esteem and misunderstanding about love are more likely to get hurt in love. Only by knowing yourself deeply through compulsory courses can you fall in love correctly.

Argument 3: No one learned traffic rules in a car accident, so why should they learn to fall in love when they are injured? Taking out your heart to fall in love is a high-risk action. Why not take a compulsory course and learn the safety rules first? Compulsory courses allow us to face the pain better. If we learn to cherish and love in advance, there may not be so much sadness.

The second round of opening up

The process of opening a bar was cut, and the process may not be very exciting. After the bar is opened, the number of votes can be inferred through the calculation of running tickets at the back.

It's positive 4 1 and negative 59.

I don't support the compulsory course of love in Qiuchen University.

Argument 1: Love class is not a problem, but "university" and "compulsory". It represents the orientation that love is taboo before college, and the compulsion to fall in love when you go to college, which increases anxiety together. However, universities should have taught us how to be more free and independent, instead of putting another layer of shackles on us.

Argument 2: Many love classes in the market actually teach basic empathy, respect, care and so on, which are actually very low-level questions. The reason why we suffer in love is not because we are absent from class, but because we have taken too many courses that make us have to cross the wooden bridge to win, and we have never experienced real life.

Argument 3: Love and many mental abilities should have been learned in the course of life, and there is no need to open another course at school. Even if the literary works of the outside world are mixed, it is also a channel for children to learn from the real world. In the class of children's growth, what really should not be absent is the company of parents.

I support the compulsory course of love in Xi Rui University.

Refutation: University compulsory does not mean/kloc-a course that can only be used after 0/8 years old. Otherwise, does compulsory computer mean that computers can only be used after university? Compulsory courses are a part of the cultivation of personality foundation. Incorporating the study of intimate relationship into the cultivation of personality foundation just reflects tolerance and self-confidence.

Parameters:

Argument 1: Love class is not about love skills. Teaching skills alone will only lead to emotional fraud. Any problem inferred from skills is not in the love class itself, but in the deviation of imagination and expectation of love.

Argument 2: The greatest significance of love class is not to define what love is, but to tell us what is not, and to avoid intimate violence and harm in the name of love.

Argument 3: Love class teaches us to know the inner world, learn to understand the changes of the inner world, learn to solve the challenges of the inner world, and thus have a better quality of life.

Argument 4: Love lessons teach us social relations. We grow into mature men and women in love. If schools do not teach correct gender concepts, gender prejudice, stigma and stereotypes in society will take advantage of it. Only by planting the seeds of compulsory courses can we reap the fruits of growth, and everyone can learn the common sense of loving and being loved.

Qiu Chen VS Xi sharp in the third round of opening.

Qiu Chen: You teach social relations to the inner world, which is obviously a love class. Isn't that selling dog meat?

Rui: Love and knowledge are not opposites. The content itself is too complicated. There is nothing wrong with integrating it under the title of love.

Qiu Chen: But you use the love theme party to attract college students who want to learn about love, but you teach these common sense, so you lack basic respect.

Rui: Regarding the handling of intimate relationships, the understanding of gender stereotypes has been closely related to love. How can it have nothing to do with the love class?

Of course, I support the compulsory course of love in Xirui University.

Knowledge and experience are not contradictory. People think that courtship skills should be taught in love classes. If teaching attitude is the biggest misunderstanding of love by the title party, then we should use compulsory courses to clarify these misunderstandings. Exploring the world and experiencing life can all be carried out under the protection of knowledge.

The opponent argues that love is a compulsory course in Qiuchen University, and I don't support it.

Argument 1: admit that what the other person wants to teach is right, but the method is wrong. It is disrespectful to teach these things in the name of love.

Argument 2: There are many bad things in society, but none of them happened on the first day. If you really want to start a compulsory course to get rid of these things, you should start it earlier, not at the university.

After three rounds of debate, the number of votes returned to the original 5 1:49, and the outcome actually depended on the closing meeting. Unfortunately, Xi Rui didn't miss the final speech, and Qiu Chen got 15 votes, and continued to draw 7 votes in the final voting session of the countdown five seconds, and finally the affirmative won with 22 votes.