In this information-based world, reading is one of the only ways for us to acquire knowledge. Reading more books can broaden our knowledge and enrich our literary accomplishment, which is of great help to our future speaking and writing.

Our knowledge is like a reservoir. A lot of reading enables our reservoir to store a lot of knowledge, and while we supplement our knowledge, our knowledge is constantly leaking out. At this time, if we stop reading or read less, the water in the reservoir will soon run out. Only by constantly enriching extracurricular reading can we enrich our knowledge without losing a lot. A lot of knowledge can provide enough material for your composition, otherwise you will only write some meaningless repetitive words if you hold it for a long time.

-

The origin of the benefits of opening books is that Song Taizu said, "As long as you study, it is always beneficial." Since then, it has become an idiom to open books.

You may think, why do you want to talk about this? The reason is simple, the key lies in the word "total" ... which means there will always be benefits, not just benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate that reading is beneficial to opening books rather than harmless. Don't be entangled in this by the opposition, or you will lose. You will understand the reason after reading it. )

First of all, it is well known that it is good for good books. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate whether the so-called bad books have some advantages of their own. As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, it is big enough to make people fully realize, repent, move towards the bright road and succeed; Little ones should learn several writing methods, a few words and even know a few words. These are the benefits of reading, which is undeniable. So you can introduce a few points to demonstrate that bad books also have some benefits:

First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will definitely affect people's character and lead people astray. But please think about it, what if those bad books can't resonate with readers and make people go deep into them? If the structure and layout, expression, conception and description, language and writing of this book are plain,

Even the general "running account" composition is not as good as it is. How can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad the book is, at least you can learn some writing methods in the so-called bad book, and at worst you can know a few words. Can you say it's useless?

Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book is judged according to whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In other words, bad books also have certain benefits.

Thirdly, Laozi in ancient China had a view that everything has two sides. Since bad books are harmful, they must have their advantages.

Fourth, maybe you want to say, "Suppose there is a bad book, the content is unsightly, the layout of the article is completely wrong, and it is full of wrong sentences and typos …" until you can't find an advantage. But have you ever thought that even if there is such a book, can anyone understand it? Will you go and see it? ~ ~ ~ Since I won't go to see it, I don't even have the premise of "opening the book". How to talk about whether opening books is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness and crime because of reading, what can this show? It can only show that the reader's own mentality is not correct. That's a matter of mentality, and you can't blame the book. Can anyone blame a knife for killing people with a knife?

Therefore, as long as you study, no matter how big or small, it is beneficial. Therefore, it can be inferred that "opening books is beneficial" will certainly be established.

As for "opening a book is not necessarily beneficial", it is a neutral word, half of which is right, but the other half-opening a book is not beneficial, so there is a problem: harmless. Just like a car on the road, it won't fly into the blue sky like an airplane. Can you say it's digging? If the argument is "open book is harmful", then according to some arguments just now, it can naturally be established, but it is wrong to say "useless".