Chinese medicine dare not do double-blind experiments. Traditional Chinese medicine has not been internationally certified. Can't you explain the problem? Chinese medicine says that it is scientific for a while, and then it says that it is beyond the scope of scientific understanding. What's the difference between this and religious people who say how God is on the one hand and then say that human beings can't understand God and can't guess God from the perspective of human beings in the face of cross-examination? As for the effect, China's life span from the summer solstice to the Qing Dynasty only increased from eighteen to thirty-three; Moreover, from the Republic of China to the present, the average life expectancy has increased from 35 years to 77 years. Doesn't that explain the problem? Many infectious diseases that were previously incurable have now been cured. Of course, scientific discoveries and problems that cannot be solved are not the same as non-existence, but isn't it normal to shelve or deny things that can't work anyway? If it can be confirmed later, let's talk about it; Science is constantly developing in the process of questioning and revising. However, Chinese medicine is somewhat similar to religion. It claims that it is always right, but it can't produce any evidence, and it can't be overturned and refuted in its own system. How can it be convincing? Although it is emotionally unacceptable for China people to deny their own nation, how can TCM progress if they are complacent? Of course, Chinese medicine is not without any effect; You know, even the placebo effect without any curative effect will have 30% to 40% effect, so it is incorrect to say that Chinese medicine has no effect.