Recently, a piece of news made a lot of noise on the Internet. It is said that a woman surnamed Lu in Chongqing was pregnant only four months after giving birth and was pregnant for two months. The new company, which has just been employed for a month, decided to fire her, thinking that she had come to defraud the welfare benefits.
Judging from the time, a woman may have been pregnant before entering this company. But it's only a month, and it's hard to tell whether you're pregnant or not. Because some people's holidays are abnormal, it is common to postpone them. It will take 40 days to have a pregnancy reaction. Only she knows the truth.
A woman who has given birth will know that she is weak after giving birth, otherwise there will be no confinement. Two months after the first delivery, Ms. Lu became pregnant again. It is difficult for ordinary people to understand her behavior. When lactation and pregnancy are intertwined, I still go to find a job. In the view of the work unit, there may be no other reason for this behavior except cheating on welfare.
Women of childbearing age will always encounter all kinds of difficulties in finding jobs. Employers generally don't want to have unborn children. Anyone who has given birth to a child is afraid that she will have another one. It is difficult to find a suitable job when you are old. Anyway, it's blocked anyway.
It is not unreasonable for this company to insist on dismissing Ms. Lu. First of all, she cheated; Secondly, the company has a heavy workload, and I'm afraid she can't do it. If an accident happens during work, the company will definitely suffer losses, and compensation is essential.
If a woman knows that she is pregnant and still hides it, she will come out and look for a job. This is not only irresponsible for one's own body, but also a matter of character. Many employers are unwilling to accept such dishonest and greedy people.
The matter has been settled, and both sides have no opinions. The company would rather spend more money than terminate the labor contract with Ms. Lu, which is also a last resort. Ms. Lu didn't work much, but she got six months' salary and made a fortune instead. It is normal for companies to avoid risks, stop losses in time and not want to get tired. There is no need to criticize.
Combined with relevant information, let me talk about my views on this incident:
In this incident, in fact, the company itself is also a victim. According to relevant local policies and regulations in Chongqing, all female employees who meet the requirements for childbirth can enjoy maternity leave for a maximum of 128 days. In addition, female employees have at least 1 hour of breastfeeding leave every working day after maternity leave.
In this incident, the woman joined the training school after the confinement, when she was still breastfeeding. As a result, she informed the school that she was pregnant again just two months after she entered school. Moreover, she was pregnant only four months before her first child.
For the company, every new employee needs corresponding training and guidance after joining the company, and it will take several months to fully adapt to the new working environment.
I think this woman's behavior is not only harmful to her health, but also affects the female group's job search in the future.
The practice of this lactating woman getting pregnant immediately after joining the company not only makes it difficult for the company to arrange her work, but also shows to the naked eye that she will take maternity leave for nearly half a year after joining the company, and will continue to have breastfeeding leave afterwards. For the company, it is equivalent to only using her for half a year, and you need to pay one year's salary. With this salary, the company could have recruited employees who were much more capable than her. Obviously, the company suffered heavy losses in this process.
I think this company will definitely think twice about the relevant background of the applicant before recruiting people in the future. The company may reject applicants with the same or similar background.
First, the compensation standard. According to the nature of this company's urine, it is barely reasonable to push the child forward for one year from the present four months, that is, when she is pregnant for about two months. Maybe Ms. Lu is hiding the fact that she is pregnant, and even joined the company without knowing it.
Less than half a year after joining the company, it is unlikely that the company will take the initiative to double pay. Assuming that the delay is less than one year after half a year, compensation will still be made according to the agreed standards (no compensation) in the case of dismissal. To tell the truth, it is not very fair to the third-phase female employees.
Even if a claim is made, there will be compensation for two months' salary. If you advocate continuing to perform the contract, the expected income is far more than the so-called consensus compensation 1 month +2 months, which seems to be a kind of generous condolences and care.
The result of such negotiations may be due to Ms. Lu's ignorance+moral pressure (so many people say that she cheated money)+lack of money+lack of confidence in the long process and outcome of arbitration proceedings+fear of the company's ultimate compensation ability+fear of affecting the health of two children (which may actually be the most important), which is a relatively cheap result for the company.
The company's unilateral dismissal of the bank has no legal right to unilaterally terminate it, and it is bound to suffer losses in law.
If Ms. Lu is right about this matter, who is wrong? It is wrong to say that Ms. Lu is wrong. Firstly, zz is incorrect. It has made great contributions to the increase of labor force in the whole society. You are afraid to have children for various reasons. Someone made a sacrifice to let you keyboard man spray?
So many people are angry, and the reasons seem reasonable. I must think that this Ms. Lu really caught a company and made great efforts. The first child must ask for leave to go to the birth check-up, and the company dare not arrange more work tasks and overtime. Naturally, the pressure on others is greater, and the overall work efficiency of the company is reduced. Forget the baby. I was pregnant just two months after I was born. Really annoying! Maybe you also feel that the boss of this company is very wronged. The salary is not low, and the insurance cost is not low. There is always no one at work.
Some people may say that I will start a company in the future, but I dare not hire female employees of school age!
Then think about it, if you ask me, this is because the system is not perfect enough, which leads to our own people being involved first! Enterprise management is also difficult, and the third-phase female employees also need protection, but the existing system is to make female employees afraid to have children, and enterprises are even more afraid to recruit female employees easily.
Don't talk nonsense How many years have you had feelings for the company? Your boss will certainly take care of you when you have children. Nobody wants to balabala after you leave. It is not illegal for female employees to have children. Don't brainwash them with a deceptive sentence that seems to have steps on both sides.
Combined with the current marriage rate, fertility rate and explosive divorce rate, this contradiction will continue to appear if women's worries are not solved from the root.
In the arrangement of maternity leave for female employees' spouses, what is the use of fifteen days? A friend of mine is depressed because he has worked so hard to see his daughter-in-law. Of course, it's okay now. If three female employees are recruited, preferential tax policies will be arranged, and enterprises will naturally settle accounts themselves, at least to alleviate the current situation.
The first paragraph is objective, and the second paragraph is empty talk. The company has said something wrong and can't afford to pay for it. It's sheer nonsense.
Finally, don't cut off social security. Call a company and continue to pay social security until you get the maternity allowance.
Ms. Lu from Chongqing just gave birth to a baby four months ago. After confinement, she came out to apply for a job in an education and training institution. She has just been working for more than a month and found that she is pregnant again. After learning that Ms. Lu was pregnant, the company would rather take responsibility and dismiss Ms. Lu. Considering the high labor intensity, educational institutions may have an impact on the fetus. It is not known whether Ms. Lu deliberately defrauded the welfare, because Ms. Lu gave birth only four months ago.
From the perspective of the enterprise, it is very helpless to make such a decision because of the management and operating costs of the enterprise. The enterprise that Ms. Lu applies for should be a private enterprise. In such an education and training institution, it is estimated that she is a teacher. If Ms. Lu is pregnant, gives birth to a child and feeds the child, she can't go to work for about a year. This is a great pressure for a private enterprise, which invisibly increases the cost, because they have to find a successor during Ms. Lu's childbirth, and they have to bear part of Ms. Lu's salary and so on. From their point of view.
From Ms. Lu's point of view, she has to bear both the pressure of being dismissed and the pain of pregnancy, suffering a double blow and feeling helpless. Just after giving birth, just four months later, I am pregnant again. This is basically an unintended pregnancy. Anyone with a little common sense knows that it is appropriate to have another baby at least half a year apart. However, there are not many ways to get pregnant. If you don't want to have an abortion, you will have to bite the bullet and have a baby, and you will have to face the pressure of raising a child in the future. It can be said that she is also very difficult. According to the law, enterprises protect pregnant women.
As we all know, as a woman, it is really not easy to have children. On the one hand, she has to bear the influence of giving birth at work, on the other hand, she has to bear the physical pain brought by giving birth, so the law gives her protection. But having a baby is a big deal after all. Now that we have decided to have children, we must consider all aspects, just like Ms. Lu in this matter. Since she wants to work to support her family and make money, she must do it well. As an enterprise, we should consider relevant issues when recruiting, have clear requirements for recruitment conditions, and explain the situation of the enterprise to the applicants in advance, so that neither side will develop into such a situation.
We are not a European welfare society. This woman is harming the interests of the school. She just gave birth and applied for a job in a private school. Two or three months later, the school found out that the woman was pregnant and dismissed her. The school negotiated with the woman and agreed to compensate for three months' salary.
Why enterprises are biased against some female employees is because these shameless women touch the interests of enterprises again and again. It is obvious to all how difficult the epidemic is this year. Business failures, layoffs, and even half of wages have made the company difficult. Enterprises are not sanatoriums, let alone welfare institutions. There is no need to be soft on those who can't create value. This is the law of the market, the survival of the fittest, and there is nothing fair or unfair. Especially with the continuous advancement of national education, the recruitment qualifications in big cities remain high, and some people will do it if you don't do it.
Just after giving birth to a child, she quickly wanted a second child and wanted to enjoy the welfare benefits of the post. How can there be such a good thing waiting for her? This kind of woman should stop occupying space and give it to young people in need to promote their employment. Experts who give birth to two children in a row and encourage fertility every day estimate that such a sensible woman will give birth to a second child immediately after giving birth to one child. If everyone is as obedient as she is, the population growth rate will be like riding a rocket.
Two children, we can't ignore education and growth then. Moreover, it is easy to get pregnant, and this family's plan to have children is very fast. My husband is really like a hardworking cow. It's amazing, and it's good for population growth. But this kind of power can move you, and you still have a long way to go to move the enterprise. Concealing pregnancy, talking about labor law every day, there are 10 thousand ways to let you go, and finally you just take the money and leave. This kind of woman is ridiculous!
Regardless of whether the company's approach is reasonable, everyone thinks that she is too risky from her own consideration. The first child is only four months old, and she is pregnant again, or almost two months pregnant. It means sleeping together for about two months, and then getting pregnant again. Her husband doesn't care about her body, doesn't she care about her own?
Generally speaking, after giving birth to a child, the doctor suggests sleeping together for three months or even half a year, and pregnancy is even more impossible. That's a joke about your life. It's not pleasant to say. If something really happens to her, don't you think her impatient husband won't look for it again? Obviously, it is impossible not to look for it!
Besides, I think the company did the right thing. If I were the boss of the company, I would rather pay her a few more months and leave.
On the one hand, she obviously uses the rights of pregnant women for her own benefit. The first one is only four months old, and now she is pregnant with a second child. Although national laws have policies to protect pregnant women, they cannot be used in this way. If she is pregnant normally, it is impossible for others to dismiss her, just as her first child company did not dismiss her. She is only four months old and gave birth to a second child. Which company dares to use her? No matter how to protect women's rights and interests, you can't do this. You regard the company as a charity. I am a woman, too. I want to get pregnant and go home immediately, instead of staying in the company for a day. I am also afraid that my work will affect the development of children.
The second reason is worrying about her physical condition. Do you think the company can afford it in case something happens to her? Take the dissolution of the labor contract as an example. She can always find a TV station to make trouble. If she accidentally hurts herself at work, she will sue the company for bankruptcy!
It is precisely because of such people who exploit loopholes that society is biased against job-seeking women.
It's good that she thinks she has a clear conscience.
Whether an individual has done something right or not may be judged differently by law and morality. But I'm worried that there will be fewer and fewer entities, because there will be a lot to bear.
Miss Lu actively responded to the call of the state to have a second child and made contributions to the future of the Chinese nation. Instead of being fired, give her a reward of100000 yuan [an epiphany] [an epiphany] [an epiphany].