At first, I thought this was a good phenomenon, indicating that everyone's awareness of learning is getting stronger and stronger. However, a careful observation of these people's circle of friends shows that this kind of book-drying behavior is essentially no different from that of luxury cars, houses and famous brands that were popular in previous years. To put it bluntly, it's all to show off.
The depth of the water is silent, people are silent, and true knowledge and wisdom are mostly invisible. They will not show off that they have read hundreds of books a year, nor will they express their opinions when something happens. They not only have the ability to know everything in the world, but also have the ability to practice spare articles before they are unearthed. They have an obvious feature that they can ask questions.
On the contrary, those who have only a little knowledge, but a bucket full of silence and half a bucket hanging around, always look smug, express their opinions when something happens, and are eager to take sides. They tried their best to convince others, but they didn't have a valid point of view to support them. They can only label themselves as "knowledgeable", "literate" and "like learning" by showing off their reading. Unfortunately, they were so poisoned that they were completely kidnapped by these labels, and the original intention of reading changed. Books have become * * * * tools for them to show off, instead of helping them open the unknown keys.
Some people, after reading several online novels, feel that they are emotional experts, after learning a few quotations from Luo, they feel that they are internet bosses, after listening to a few classical music, they feel that they are music critics, and after watching a few minority movies, they feel that they are film critics. Another obvious feature of them is that they can answer.
If this is called educated learning, can people who have installed Baidu APP on their mobile phones still call themselves scholars or masters? For example, there is a very popular writer on the Internet who claims to have read more than 20,000 books in four years in college, and some netizens help him calculate. More than 20,000 books in four years. On average, he reads 13-20 books every day. Even if I can't read, I'm afraid it's difficult to turn pages. As a result, the writer angered the ignorance of netizens and said that he was reading picture books. Is it the ignorance of netizens or this?
In this era of scarce attention, everyone has the same amount of information. No matter how knowledgeable you are, you are no bigger than "Du Niang". It is easy to find the answer from Baidu's search bar, but what really determines the competition is what kind of questions you can type in that search bar, not what kind of knowledge you know.
Compared with not knowing, not knowing that you don't know is the most terrible. In our general cognition, everyone thinks that pride makes people lag behind and modesty makes people progress, but after careful scrutiny, this sentence is undoubtedly the biggest lie! Really diligent people * * * know that they don't know. * * * Every time he learns a little knowledge and understands a truth, he will be awed by the greater unknown from the bottom of his heart. They will only sigh that they know too little and complain that they know too late.
So their hearts are anxious, uneasy, curious and dissatisfied. They are good at asking questions and dare to argue with themselves. Even if it is a simple truth that everyone knows, they will break it, crush it, ponder it carefully, seriously reflect on it and rebuild their knowledge system.
Such people, reading, are all "case-solving" reading. Every step is to open a new unknown, kill a new unknown and gradually expand the area they know. And those who don't know what they don't know are more like utilitarianism. What others give him, he will learn indiscriminately, just like someone in Zhihu asks, "You have read so many books and learned so much, why can't you live this life?" ? It's simple. The knowledge piled up by quantity can't stand the slightest doubt and scrutiny, which means that the books you read can only be books, and the truth you learn will always be the truth of others. A while ago, the top candidates in the college entrance examination in various provinces were first reported by the media. One of them is the best candidate. The reporter asked him if there were any secrets in his study. He said: "there is no secret, just brush the questions, but you can't do it first, and then you will do it." Because you already know, you should spend more time on questions that you can't. "
The reason sounds simple, but most people haven't seriously thought about it. They just heard teachers and parents say that what can be done should be done first, and what can't be done should be left to the last. As a result, most of the time is spent on what they already know, and what they can't do is still not.
Knowing what you don't know and how to reduce your ignorance is the watershed between truly excellent and ordinary. The more people with low ability, the less they can accurately infer their cognitive level, so they don't know what they don't know, let alone how to kill themselves. So that they are always proud of how many books they have read, and they have not cultivated deeply, let alone iteratively cultivated deeply. They are still complacent in the limited knowledge of the infinite loop, and finally they can only touch themselves.
Some people may retort that if you don't learn so much knowledge first, how can you ask quality questions and judge whether you don't know?
Indeed, it is impossible to achieve qualitative change without quantitative change, but have you ever seen that man who eats well? Does he only eat without chewing? The real quantity is based on quality, which sounds a bit contradictory. Let me explain it to you with a real case of a friend losing weight. Last week, I invited a friend I hadn't seen for a long time to have dinner with. I didn't recognize her at first. She used to be quite fat 147g, but after half a year's absence, she lost weight and became a bolt of lightning. I was shocked. I asked her how she did it. She said that she didn't deliberately lose weight, but she improved the quality of the food. I'm at a loss. What about eating? Can it be improved? Seeing a puzzled face, she took out a small bowl from her bag. I thought she was afraid that the tableware in the restaurant was unsanitary and brought her own bowl. So, she calmly put a little of everything on the table into her bowl, then put a spoonful of rice in a small bowl and ate it slowly. I asked her, can a bowl as big as a fist be filled? She said that she used to eat three meals, and every meal was to swallow all the delicious food she saw and pour it into her stomach. As a result, she harvested a stomach with duodenal ulcer and a pile of fat. To this end, she decided to improve the quality of the food. She changed three meals to six meals and ate as much as before, but only allowed herself to eat a small bowl at a time. Seeing so much food in her small bowl, she tried to slow down and chew it carefully. After persisting for a period of time, she found that her stomach slowly improved and her weight began to drop slowly. The same is the change of quantity. The latter "implemented in stages", found the law of quantitative change, and finally achieved qualitative change. Quantitative change and qualitative change are both opposite and unified, and the core is the word "deep cultivation".
What you have learned and the books you have read are not worthless, but too valuable. You don't know where to start. What you need to do is to "sharpen" your own value and pierce other people's thoughts, so as to truly "polish" your own label and have its own characteristics.
After all, distinctive features are easier to identify than colorful ones. Nowadays, there are more and more online celebrities, but only a few of them are "lasting", such as Li, papi sauce and office leaflets. The reason why they are "long red" is that each of them has a highly recognizable feature, that is, the value barrier they have established after deep cultivation in their own fields. This value barrier will get higher and higher as they kill more unknowns, so that the latecomers have only one name "imitator". There are no shortcomings, only features * * * *, * * In this world, every feature, put in the right angle, is an advantage * * * *, there are no good readers and no bad readers, no matter what reason you start reading, you always win a step compared with those who just want to stop and not do it. However, blindly accelerating * * *, ignoring the accumulation of depth, * * * * will often * * * * lose itself in "fragmentation". We walked on the road for a long time, but we don't remember why we started. No one should live a standard life, what is more important is to live on their own. May your life be full of what you want and leave a blank.
If you have anything to say about the article, you can speak freely under the comments and interact with netizens. Some pictures come from the internet.
Pay attention to cucumbers and interpret different lifestyles for you. Your's praise, collection, forwarding and comments are the greatest encouragement for me to continue the code word. If the story inspires you, please share it with your friends. ?