I don't think my muscle mass is that big, so I practice four times a week. I don't do aerobic exercise except the day I practice my legs. After about 1 hour of strength training, I will add about 30 minutes of aerobic exercise in the other three days.
I will try my best to keep the training weight in the offseason when preparing for the competition, so that I can keep as few muscles as possible. Because this training mode can tell the body that I still need muscles, and I can't let them go. However, if you use a relatively light weight for training, at this time, the body will be smart to find that it can maintain the existing calories without too much muscle. The above calculations are all carried out in an ideal state. There is definitely no way to simply consume fat for real fat reduction. For reference, the actual heat difference should be much greater than 3850 calories/month.
Protein can be a little more. The thermal effect of protein digestion is higher than that of carbohydrates, and the feeling of satiety is higher than that of carbohydrates. In addition, there is a more effective strategy. At the beginning of fat reduction, the calorie intake was slightly higher and gradually decreased. In terms of calorie consumption, the total oxygen during the fat reduction period gradually increased by about half an hour every week. Because the important strategy of human body to cope with hunger is to reduce metabolic rate to preserve body fat, and gradually increase calorie difference to cope with this human mechanism, which can keep the progress of fat reduction stable. I admire your perseverance and persistence in pursuing a good figure, but your theory does have many loopholes and unreasonable places, and any friend who has systematically studied bodybuilding and fitness knowledge should hold the opposite view.