The ratio of stimulation to fatigue is not very good. I mean, when you do four sets of movements, what is the effect of your back movements? This is shit. When you pull hard, your weight is squeezed out for a week. Muscle connections in the brain are also terrible. The only sport with worse stimulus-fatigue ratio is weightlifting. Unless you are a weightlifter, this is a mess.
Huge axial load. Mm-hmm ... Obviously. An unpopular but very effective exercise: Romanian hard lift. If your goal is to be fat, then RDL is what you should do, not the traditional hard work. It has more complete ROM than the traditional crash. It actually has centrifugal contraction and centripetal contraction. ROM is different from traditional hard-drawn ROM, it is determined by the radius of the board you use, but ROM is determined by the hinge of your hip and the degree of pushing your hip as much as possible.
From all aspects, the traditional hard lift is not an amazing hypertrophy tool. If your goal is muscle growth (unless you only train 2-3 times a week), then leave the traditional hard lifting exercise to the strength training unit. Then the stimulus fatigue rate is not a problem, and the dead angle is a cool addition.
That's why you don't see smart people like Mike israel, Mano Heinzel Mans and Eric Helms lifting weights for fat.
Ps: You can disagree with me, but you must admit that from a physiological point of view, death is a piece of shit with long muscles for most people. There are always exceptions.