But the reality is not as beautiful as we thought. The following is the correct rate of the real analogy reasoning part of the background statistics of 15 and 16:
This statistic shows that many small partners can only do 60% of the problems by analogy, which is far from meeting the requirements.
According to my observation and research for so many years, friends who have poor analogical reasoning ability and learn more painfully often have the following three problems. If they want to improve qualitatively, they must change their thinking and accumulate in a down-to-earth manner.
First of all, I don't know the test sites, so I can imagine at will. Specifically, it shows disrespect for scientific common sense and ethical laws and regulations, and makes sentences indiscriminately.
It is clearly written in the outline: it is required to find a group of words with the closest or similar logical relationship among the alternative answers through observation and analysis.
What is a logical relationship? What are the logical relationships?
Some students have not studied systematically and have no concept at all. I can forgive this kind of classmate. What I can't forgive is that those students who throw it away after learning don't remember it at all, or remember it, but throw it aside as soon as they do the problem, make sentences at will, and find fault with the proposer and the teacher with all kinds of ridiculous reasons, ignoring the logical relationship and objective laws they have learned.
For example, this topic:
Vicissitudes: white hair
A. erudition: glasses
B. Immature: deciduous teeth
C. reckless: robust
D. purity: dimples
From time to time, some students ask: Why can't A? White hair represents vicissitudes of life, and glasses represent erudition.
Who told you that wearing glasses represents erudition?
There are also many people who choose C. They think that strength represents recklessness and dimples represent purity. ...
Another example is this topic:
Water: forest: coal
A. Nitrogen: protein: Intelligence
B. Lightning: Rain: Open an umbrella
C. Snow: Good Year: Joy
D. Praise: Confidence: Optimism
Some students chose C, which they explained to me. Where there is water, there is forest, and where there is forest, there is coal. ...
Which teacher taught you all this knowledge?
It also rains in the desert. Why didn't the forest form?
Don't think I'm exaggerating. My job is far more interesting and helpless than you think.
Second, there is no consciousness of "choosing better", which is manifested in obsession with a dead end and carelessness.
It is clearly written in the outline: it is required to find a group of words with the closest or similar logical relationship among the alternative answers through observation and analysis. Since it is the closest or similar choice, there must be more than one close or similar choice. Some students chose item A when they saw some similarities. In fact, there are others that are closer or similar, so they are ruthlessly ignored. This kind of students is a minority, even if there are, once reminded to correct, they will not commit it again. It is more common to "walk into a dead end", such as the following question:
Port: berthing
A. Genes: heredity
B. Courts: litigation
C. Cable: power generation
D. Roads: traffic
The correct rate of this question is less than 70%. When I first saw this data, I was incomprehensible and even a little depressed. I once doubted the value of my work. What do you think of those who don't choose D? I can only comfort myself and make myself feel a little relieved: those who don't choose D haven't heard my class. When asked, "Teacher, why not choose A/B/C?" I can't help but go back every time: how to rule out D?
What kind of option is "better"? Simply put, there are more options with the same logical relationship.
There are two operating skills to do the problem:
First, compare the attributes of things vertically. The closer the attributes are, the closer the relationship will be. For example, logically speaking, this question is about "function, function", and the function of the harbor is berthing. A, C and D all have this relationship, but seaports and highways are used for transportation, which is their similarity in category attributes. Other options do not have this attribute, so the best answer is D.
The second is to look at the part of speech, the logical relationship is the same, and choose the same part of speech vertically.
However, the above two are not the main reasons, indicating that we are basically normal people. The main reason is that some small partners have narrow knowledge and really don't understand the knowledge involved in the topic. Moreover, according to my observation, the questions with the highest error rate are generally common sense questions such as history, economy, biology, chemistry, physics and Chinese.
For example, this question:
Hippocampus is to () what () is to coral.
A. sea dragon: anemone
B. hippo: reef
C. Trojan horse: conch
D. Shell: kelp
I guess many students don't know what hippocampus is.
Another example is this question:
Books: Books: Series
A. Idioms: words: vocabulary
B. Trees: Woods: forests
C. skirt: clothes: clothes
D. People: People: People
Students who make mistakes must be confused about the logical relationship between works, books, series, idioms, words and vocabulary. Is this understanding biased? I don't think it counts.
Another example is this question:
Calling a Deer a Horse: Reversing Black and White
A. Disapprove: dismissive
B. bull without eyes: mouse without eyes.
C. Teachers' own use: opinionated
D. live up to public expectations: people expect to return.
The correct rate of this question is less than 40%. I must have made a mistake because I didn't know that calling a deer a horse and reversing black and white are synonyms, and I didn't know the meaning of teachers' personal use.
Some students said, you don't have to scold me. I know I didn't study hard at the beginning. The question is how to accumulate common sense efficiently.
First, do more questions. Because a lot of knowledge is actually tested repeatedly, if you encounter strange common sense, you should remember it carefully and check it carefully.
Second, there are many convenient channels to accumulate common sense. Recommend a few for everyone:
I. Website of China Science Popularization, website: /science/
The second is the popular science, economy and culture channels of various news apps.
The third is Baidu Encyclopedia and Interactive Encyclopedia. In addition to these, there are many, welcome friends to add.
I have repeatedly stressed the importance of accumulating common sense, because most topics are strongly dependent on common sense, such as definition and judgment. Many topics come from subdivided encyclopedia websites such as Baidu Encyclopedia and Interactive Encyclopedia.
Analogical reasoning is a topic that should not lose too many points, at least it should not be delayed. Regarding analogical reasoning, if you are confused, please reply and communicate. If you have any questions, answer them.
Ps: The answers to the above six questions are: B (symbolic relation), A (necessary condition), D (functional function), A (inclusion relation), A (constitutive relation) and C (synonym).
In addition, these two papers may have the following three questions. Please do it and announce the answer when you post graphic reasoning's post on Friday.
1, customs: inspection: tariff
A. optical cable: communication: network speed
B. filtering: purifying: drinking
C. Woods: Oxygen: Health
D. Desert: Camel: Transportation
2, goods: dazzling.
A. Shopping center: bustling
B. Companies: Developing Strategies
C. Teaching: intense and orderly
D. Family: Love each other.
3, () for disease is equivalent to news for ()
I. Bacteria: Report
B. viruses: concerns
C, drugs: live broadcast
D, ward: moved