Gf2 has all the functions of gf3, and its performance is almost the same.

But gf3 is much more than gf2.

Firstly, gf3 iso can reach 12800, and GF2 can only reach 6400.

Secondly, gf3 is the smallest SLR camera (micro-single camera) in the world, and gf2 is slightly larger.

It can be mastered with one hand, which is very compact. gf2 is not as beautiful as gf3.

The third is that the price of the two machines is the same, so we must choose a new model.

The theoretical focusing speed of gf3 is twice that of gf2, but in practice, the focusing speed of GF3 and GF2 is the same, both of which are super fast.

I prefer gf3 because it feels good in my hand and can be held firmly with one hand. I like it very much, and it is more beautiful.

Of course, gf3 hardware has been simplified.

The first one is usually useless without hot boots, at least I haven't used it in recent years.

Second, gf3 has no stereo microphone, although gf2' s stereo microphone has no stereo effect.

The third is the lack of EVF interface. Seriously, who wants to buy something over 1000 yuan? It doesn't work well after installation ~ it's too big.

Other parameters and hardware are basically the same. Gf3 is a simplified version of gf2.

I hope my answer will dispel your doubts.

If you have any questions, please ask.

Happy April Fool's Day

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Compared with SLR, gf2/3 has fewer pentaprism, smaller volume, lighter weight, changeable appearance and arbitrary.

I hope my answer will dispel your doubts.

If you have any questions, please ask.

Happy April Fool's Day