Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Healthy weight loss - How many years were the two anchors sentenced to live broadcast of Liangshan pseudo-charity?
How many years were the two anchors sentenced to live broadcast of Liangshan pseudo-charity?
In September last year, a video of an anchor engaged in fake charity in Daliangshan exploded on the Internet. On September 7, Butuo County People's Court of Liangshan Prefecture pronounced a verdict on this online fraud case.

It is reported that the anchor "Aauto Faster Jiege" Yang attracts fans through live broadcast and gets a gift of 2 1 10,000 yuan; The anchor "Aauto Faster Black Uncle" Liu Moumou attracted fans through live broadcast and got a gift of 1.9 million yuan. In the end, the two network anchors were sentenced to more than three years respectively.

It was found through trial that the defendants Yang and Liu led netizens to the mountainous area of Butuo County several times during August and September of 20 16 to attract more fans to receive more gifts and obtain financial benefits, and gathered poor old people and children to give materials (towels, soap, rice, meat, fruit, etc.) in the name of public welfare. ) and a small amount of money as a temptation, give them 200. Later, the video of handing over money was uploaded to the online "Aauto Quicker" platform for live broadcast, and during the live broadcast, fans were asked to brush gifts for him and buy things for those in need. There was a love from fans in charity. Yang made a profit of 250,545.05 yuan through webcasting, and the withdrawal amount was 21673,38+05 yuan. Liu obtained 230368. 15 yuan through the live webcast, and the withdrawal amount was 194506.34 yuan.

In the end, "A auto Faster Jiege" Yang was sentenced to 3 years and 8 months for committing online fraud, and "A auto Faster Black Uncle" Liu was sentenced to 3 years and 6 months.

The two used the love of netizens to conduct online fraud, which involved a wide range and had a bad social impact. The public hearing of this case shows the confidence and determination of the people's court to crack down on online fraud.