Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Healthy weight loss - There is a 6d2, and I want to buy a lens to take a portrait of a still life. Recommend it?

Canon 6d2 is Canon's entry-level SLR, which is said to have the largest sales volume. Not only individu

There is a 6d2, and I want to buy a lens to take a portrait of a still life. Recommend it?

Canon 6d2 is Canon's entry-level SLR, which is said to have the largest sales volume. Not only individu

There is a 6d2, and I want to buy a lens to take a portrait of a still life. Recommend it?

Canon 6d2 is Canon's entry-level SLR, which is said to have the largest sales volume. Not only individuals, but also units and collective enterprises will buy it, because it mainly has 24- 105f4.0 lens group. If you don't have this camera and want to take a portrait with 6d2, I recommend two lenses according to your own situation. One is 702002.8, one of the three big yuan. Not only can you take portraits, but you can also take documentary portraits and even scenery, which is quite good. In the case of 2.8 aperture at 200 ends, the photos taken are not only blurred, clean and transparent, but also have the effect of "air cutting machine". It's a little heavy, but it's worth the money. It's very suitable for your portrait.

Secondly, when you say still life, I don't know what effect to achieve. If you shoot flowers, 70200 is quite good; If you want to shoot the sharpness of still life or the macro of still life, then I suggest you buy another Budweiser 100 macro lens, which is specially used to shoot the macro of still life. Sharp is its characteristic, and bright colors are also its performance. At the same time, this lens can also shoot portraits or other photographed objects. Not bad money, just enter this lens. In addition, Canon's 24-70f4.0 aperture also has macro function. If you think it's possible, you might as well consider it.

I suggest you buy Canon EF 85mm f/ 1.4L is USM (the price is around 9000).

The red circle lens has guaranteed quality, high definition and blurred background. 70-200 2.8 is a zoom lens. This shot is also one of the big ternary shots in the red circle. The quality is good, but the imaging quality will be worse than that of 85 1.4 lens (zoom lens is not as good as fixed focus lens in imaging and background blur). If you only shoot portraits and still life, I suggest you buy 85 1.4 lens.

Local tyrants can also consider EF 85 mm f/ 1.2L II USM (the price is around 12000), which is known as the "portrait mirror emperor" and its resolution is recognized as one of the best. Especially in weak light, its performance is more obvious. The advantages are more prominent.

Photography can be said to be a fun thing, and money is even more fun. You can also buy the best lenses and cameras regardless of the price of equipment and experience some advantages brought by high-end products. My photography is also poor, so I have been playing with some entry-level photography products from beginning to end, so I always feel that there is something wrong with my photography. Now I finally understand that besides photography technology, photographic equipment is equally important (but not the only one). So I suggest that if you have money, you'd better go directly. At least you can take better photos. There is a 6d2, and I want to buy a lens to take a portrait of a still life. Recommend it? Which lens should I buy, the 85 focal length of 85 1-4 or the 85 focal length of 70-200 2.8? According to the needs of the landlord, if you choose one, I suggest buying 85F 1.4. Let me be specific:

1 and 70-200F 2.8 are necessary lenses for portraits in photo studios, but they are bulky and really heavy, which can be regarded as the kind of bulky fitness equipment. Once you combine your 6D2, I conclude that if you can't shoot 1 hour, you will regret your decision. Therefore, from the point of view of portability, 70-200F 2.8 is not recommended.

2. In terms of image quality, both models are good lenses, and the image quality will not be too bad. If we have to compete with each other on the computer to enlarge the contrast, the fixed focus 85 1.4 will definitely prevail, and its lens design is obviously more leisurely, and there are not as many problems to be considered as zoom lenses. However, are you sure you will enlarge it on the computer and then enlarge it? In fact, in most cases, photos are sent to friends and uploaded to the internet, so it is difficult for us to distinguish the good from the bad. So there is no need to worry too much about the picture quality.

3. If you want to recommend it, I think the landlord might as well consider 85F 1.8, which is the same as the portrait of 85 people. It's more than half lighter and much cheaper, although the picture quality is not very good. However, patting casually, from the perspective of hobbies, is completely enough. After all, 85mm focal length portraits are often like this. If you take it for a long time, you will get tired of it. It's a waste to dust off 8,000 lenses.

To sum up, it is suggested that 85 1.4 fixed-focus lens is the first choice, followed by the cheaper 85F 1.8.

50 fixed focus lens

The lens suitable for taking portraits and still life is a medium focal length lens with constant focal length and large aperture (for example, 50 mm/1.4; 50mm/ 1 8; 60mm/2 8; 85mm/ 1 4; 90 mm/2.8) and long focal length lens (such as105 mm/1.4; 150/2.8) is better.

Generally speaking, under the same focal length, the larger the aperture, the better the imaging effect and the higher the price. The price of 50 mm/ 1.8 is around 700 yuan, and the price of 50 mm/ 1.4 is around 2800 yuan. The price of portrait king lens 85mm/ 1.4 is about 8500 yuan, and the price of 85mm/ 1.8 is about 3200 yuan. ...

As far as shooting effect is concerned, the larger the aperture value and focal length, the better the imaging effect. The main performance is that the picture is bright, the color reproduction is realistic and natural, the background is blurred, the subject is prominent and eye-catching.

85 1.4 20 17 was launched at the end of this year, weighing 900g, with a recent focal length of 0.85m and a price of about 9000 yuan.

70-200 2.8 3 generation, launched on 20 18, weighing1500g, recent focal length 1.2m, and the price is about 12000 yuan.

Both are 77 mm caliber.

According to the experience I recommended in the past, I advocate buying new ones instead of old ones. The new ones are definitely better than the old ones. When the listing time is about the same. I recommend you to buy 85.

You are taking portraits and still lifes. 85 and 70-200 are like kings. 70-200 is too heavy, so it's very tiring to hang and hold it. Although the bald head looks more professional, it is more eye-catching, heavier, more expensive and closer than 85 1.4.

85 1.4 is known as the king of portraits, and people's ability can be imagined. You won't regret it if you buy it.

The difference is nearly 4000, and you can also match a Canon 35 2.0. Or 35 1.4 in one step. Indoor portraits and environmental portraits can be considered.

Just use the new 100 micro for still life shooting and 50 titles 1.4 for portrait shooting. I have both of them. Don't listen to other people's advice. 50 1.2 and 80 1.4 are several times more expensive, and the shooting effect is better. Which shots are for people who pretend to be forced!

The fixed-focus lens is 35 mm/1.4usm.50 MMF/1.2usm.85 MMF/1.2usm. The zoom lens is 24-70mmf/2.8l USM. 70-200mmf/2.8l USM. The above models are all very human.

If you only shoot portraits and still lives (regardless of weight), it is strongly recommended to buy 70-200 white rabbits or umbrellas. Can meet your needs.

At the same time, I suggest you carefully check the lens list listed in the 6d2 instruction manual (download the detailed instruction manual from official website), and I suggest you buy the "A" lens in the list. This kind of lens can completely cover all 45 cross focus points of the fuselage, and can give full play to the focusing function of the fuselage!

Buy a lens or try to buy an original lens. First, focus accurately; Second, post-processing software (such as Canon DPP) can restore the shooting effect and details very well, and actually provide the added value of post-processing. I use a Canon camera, and I usually use RAW documents for shooting, and DPP, LR and SP have been used for post-processing. However, after a period of comparison, it is found that the original software has more details of the pictures, and the lens correction is more desirable and natural. Especially when dealing with excessive gradient of color and light and shade, the effect will be more natural and oily. LR processing is a bit stiff and unnatural.

In order to obtain the added value provided by post-processing (all functions of DPP software), only the original lens can be selected. The third-party lens cannot be used in the software provided by the original factory, and the defects of the lens cannot be corrected and optimized.

Canon "big eyes", 85 1.2 in one step, no regrets!