Details determine success or failure. Macro camera measurement recommendation

The image quality of the needle tip is quite different from that of Maimang D5 100/600D.

Comparative evaluation of Leica X 1 Ricoh GXR in the collision of humanistic sharp weapons

Small white cannon set Canon 4 70-200L sharpness duel

Can size deny victory or defeat? Measurement suggestion of large sensor camera

Measurement recommendation of high-quality wide-angle portable camera with great love for scenery

Learn the creative application of white balance in photography from scratch.

Learn photography from scratch and explain the application of spot metering in detail.

Review on the quality of Canon18 megapixel SLR

Single battery VS SLR Sony NEX-5 vs Nikon D5 100

Who is sharper? Nikon 50/1.8g vs 50/1.8d.

IT 168 macro evaluation has always been a favorite shooting subject, especially those who like to shoot flowers or small objects close-up, and will pay more attention to the nearest focal length of the camera when buying a camera. However, if you want to take a better macro close-up photo, it is not enough to have an ultra-close focal length. The camera's magnification, anti-shake performance and high noise control ability will all affect the imaging details. This time, eight digital cameras with the recent focusing distance below 1cm were selected to further discuss the imaging details of these cameras, and finally a digital camera product with the strongest macro performance was selected for users.

Great recommendation of the strongest macro camera measurement

▲ Canon G 12

▲ Fuji HS 1 1

▲ Sony HX 100

▲ Sony TX 100

▲ Ricoh GR-DIII

▲ Nikon L 120

▲ Panasonic FZ 100

▲ Canon SX30IS

8 Basic characteristics of digital cameras

Comparison table of 8 camera parameters

"Product model

Macro closest distance wide-angle equivalent focal length

"canon G 12

“ 1cm

"28 mm

"Fuji HS 1 1

“ 1cm

24 mm

"Sony HX 100

“ 1cm

"27 mm

"Sony TX 100

“ 1cm

"25 mm

"Ricoh GRDIII

“ 1cm

"28 mm

"Nikon L 120

“ 1cm

"25 mm

"Panasonic FZ 100

"0 cm

"25 mm

"Canon SX30IS

"0 cm

24 mm

Comparison table of macro and wide-angle equivalent focal lengths of eight cameras recently focused.

If you want to shoot an image as big as or even larger than the real thing, besides the closest focusing distance at ultra-close range, the higher magnification provided by the long focal length can also help a lot. In actual shooting, the macro effect of the camera is determined by the nearest focal length and the actual equivalent focal length. Therefore, Fuji HS 1 1 and Canon SX30IS with an equivalent focal length of 24mm were eliminated first.

Comparative display of wide-angle field of view compared with real shooting effect

The above picture is a comparative display of the wide-angle field of view ratio of six products. As can be seen from the figure, the visual field ratios of G 12, GR-DIII and HX 100 are basically the same, and the visual field ratios of L 120 and FZ 100 are basically the same, but the visual field ratio of TX 100 is equivalent to 25 mm. ..

The image quality of the needle tip is quite different from that of Maimang D5 100/600D.

Comparative evaluation of Leica X 1 Ricoh GXR in the collision of humanistic sharp weapons

Small white cannon set Canon 4 70-200L sharpness duel

Can size deny victory or defeat? Measurement suggestion of large sensor camera

Measurement recommendation of high-quality wide-angle portable camera with great love for scenery

Learn the creative application of white balance in photography from scratch.

Learn photography from scratch and explain the application of spot metering in detail.

Review of Image Quality of Canon18 Megapixel SLR

Single battery VS SLR Sony NEX-5 vs Nikon D5 100

Who is sharper? Nikon 50/1.8g vs 50/1.8d.

Anti-shake performance competition

Shooting in a poor light environment is a very big test for the anti-shake performance of the camera. It has excellent anti-shake performance, which can help users get clearer images when taking macro photos with hand-held cameras. In the competition of anti-shake performance, Sony TX 100, Ricoh GRDIII and Nikon L 120 were eliminated in this round.

Election camera parameter comparison table

"Product model

Nearest focal length optical anti-shake

"canon G 12

“ 1cm

"Third gear.

"Sony HX 100

“ 1cm

"2.8 files.

"Sony TX 100

“ 1cm

second gear

Ricoh GRDIII

1cm

second gear

Nikon L 120

1cm

second gear

"Panasonic FZ 100

"0 cm

"3.3 files.

Contrast display of anti-shake performance

Macro image quality competition

If you want to shoot close-ups in macro mode, the performance of image quality is of course very important. In the macro mode image quality test, we use the same test environment, set the camera to macro mode and shoot at the nearest focal length at the wide-angle end. All the samples were taken with a camera that can clearly see the font on the wheel and can manually adjust the aperture. The following are Sony HX 100, Canon G 12 and Panasonic FZ 100, which won the anti-shake duel and showed the real shot proofs with the nearest focal length.

▲ Sony HX 100 1cm

▲ Canon G 12 1cm

▲ Panasonic FZ 100 0cm

Macro real shot sample comparison (click to view larger image)

▲ Sony HX 100 1cm

▲ Canon G 12 1cm

▲ Panasonic FZ 100 0cm

Macro real shot sample center details 100% screenshot

In the macro shooting test, Panasonic FZ 100 did not show its real strength because the lens was on the model's wheel eyebrow when shooting. We can see from the 100% screenshot of the center details of macro-shot proofs that Canon G 12 has the highest imaging quality, followed by Panasonic FZ 100, and Sony HX 100 because the center image quality is not as good as Canon G 12 and Panasonic FZ/kloc.

Flip the screen to enrich the shooting angle.

Finally, the two products that entered the duel, Canon G 12 and Panasonic FZ 100, all adopted the rollover screen design, which can provide users with more diversified shooting angles. The following is the rollover effect of the two products.

Canon G 12 flip screen effect display

Panasonic FZ 100 flip screen effect display

The image quality of the needle tip is quite different from that of Maimang D5 100/600D.

Comparative evaluation of Leica X 1 Ricoh GXR in the collision of humanistic sharp weapons

Small white cannon set Canon 4 70-200L sharpness duel

Can size deny victory or defeat? Measurement suggestion of large sensor camera

Measurement recommendation of high-quality wide-angle portable camera with great love for scenery

Learn the creative application of white balance in photography from scratch.

Learn photography from scratch and explain the application of spot metering in detail.

Review on the quality of Canon18 megapixel SLR

Single battery VS SLR Sony NEX-5 vs Nikon D5 100

Who is sharper? Nikon 50/1.8g vs 50/1.8d.

Ultimate picture quality showdown

After four rounds of elimination, Canon G 12 and Panasonic FZ 100 entered the final round of image quality confrontation. In the test of image quality, the exposure parameters of the two products are basically the same. We cut the same position from the real sample and compare the performance of the two products in noise control ability. The photosensitive range of Canon G 12 is ISO80-3200, and that of Panasonic FZ 100 is ISO 100- 1600.

▲ Screen detail comparison 100% screenshot diagram

Shutter: 1s/ aperture: F8/ sensitivity: ISO 100/ white balance: auto /35mm equivalent focal length: 85mm.

Shutter: 0.8 second/aperture: F8/ sensitivity: ISO 100/ white balance: auto /35mm equivalent focal length: 80mm.

Comparison of screenshots of two products 100%

The exposure of samples collected by G 12 under ISO 100 is about 1/3EV higher than that of ISO80. Under the leadership of ISO400, the spirit was slightly reduced, and ISO800 began to lose details. Under ISO 1600, the loss of detail and sharpness becomes more obvious. Although the graininess under ISO3200 is stronger, there is no color drift. But the noise of FZ 100 is more obvious than that of G 12. In ISO 100, there is recognizable noise, while in ISO200, the clarity is slightly reduced, and in ISO400, there is obvious detail loss, accompanied by slight color drift. In ISO800, although the noise distribution is relatively uniform, the overall tone is a little cold. When the sensitivity is increased to ISO 1600, the noise is more obvious and there is color difference. In the last game, Canon G 12 finally defeated Panasonic FZ 100 with obvious advantages, especially the sharper picture performance under high sense.

The image quality of the needle tip is quite different from that of Maimang D5 100/600D.

Comparative evaluation of Leica X 1 Ricoh GXR in the collision of humanistic sharp weapons

Small white cannon set Canon 4 70-200L sharpness duel

Can size deny victory or defeat? Measurement suggestion of large sensor camera

Measurement recommendation of high-quality wide-angle portable camera with great love for scenery

Learn the creative application of white balance in photography from scratch.

Learn photography from scratch and explain the application of spot metering in detail.

Review of Image Quality of Canon18 Megapixel SLR

Single battery VS SLR Sony NEX-5 vs Nikon D5 100

Who is sharper? Nikon 50/1.8g vs 50/1.8d.

IT 168 evaluation center finally recommended.

Canon G 12 won the contest through wide-angle vision, anti-shake and picture details. The closest focal length of Canon G 12 is 1cm, and the equivalent focal length of wide-angle end is 28mm. It supports three-speed anti-shake, has the finest picture quality in macro mode, and also has a good performance in noise control. It can adapt to complex shooting environment, and it is the digital camera product with the most recent focal length below 1cm.

▲ The strongest macro camera: Canon G 12 market price is 3,700 yuan.

Product parameter

product name

Canon G 12

[citation]

[parameters]

[picture]

General parameters

Sensor description

Use DIGIC 4 image processor.

Sensor type

Charge coupled device