............... Black Knight is more expensive than Swiss Lotus not because of the high cocoa butter content ... but because of the cocoa itself or brand and the price in this area. I remember it was a single origin of the Amazon River. 56% cocoa butter looks like it. What's more, 88% of the price of Black Knight is similar to 90% of Swiss Lotus. Let me ask you a question. Do you think the Black Knight is 88% delicious? My personal opinion is: the water is light and has no natural taste of cocoa, just like eating butter. On the contrary, the black knight's milk chocolate has a high evaluation. Because one of the characteristics of black knight chocolate is the high content of cocoa butter, which destroys the bitter and sour taste of all cocoa. Of course, everyone has a different opinion. The problem of cocoa butter content is actually limited to middle and low grade chocolate. This problem can be ignored directly for high-grade chocolate. No brand will say that you don't choose the one with high cocoa butter content to save that money. In addition, my personal suggestion is that godiva is good if you want to give it away, because many people know it. Please choose something else if you eat by yourself. The value of godiva lies in the brand, not the thing itself. I recommend pralus 100% Madagascar. I have eaten all the contents of lindt and haven't read the packaging carefully, but 18% is almost certainly a lie. I recommend several brands: lindt (Acid) Golden Elephant 1848 (Affordable) Coffee Messenger (77% is very good) medium and high-grade pralus Michel Crewe Ezelle; Henry Leroux (good); Zott; Slitti (Ecuador is only 90% good). Go up, like amedei. Don't touch domori. I don't think it's interesting anyway. ...

Just got 99% Swiss lotus, and there is no cocoa butter content label on the back, and pralus 100% also has no cocoa butter content label.