If teachers are respected, considering their safety, who will bear the responsibility if they are infected in the process of delivering books at home? Recently, the school received a notice from the superior requesting to open a webcast classroom. As a result, parents are dissatisfied, mainly in two aspects: one is that the internet is slow and they can't hear classes at all; The other is that children can't preview the textbooks for the new semester and review the home visit plan after class. So this voice of discontent was quickly transmitted to the functional departments of education. Under pressure, the school asked teachers to visit students' homes and deliver books. In my opinion? This is by no means rational, if you respect the teacher? Why not give priority to the safety of teachers? Who will bear the responsibility for being infected during the home visit?

If the school wants to distribute new textbooks, the home visit plan can let parents go to the school to collect them themselves or the school can send the fees by express delivery. If the school wants to distribute textbooks, parents can go to the school to collect them themselves or deliver them through a courier company. If there is a fee, parents can do it themselves. You don't need teachers to send them door to door. If parents are unwilling to pay the courier fee, they can go to school to collect it themselves. As for home visits, the internet is so convenient now, every class has classes, and parents can also add parents, WeChat friends and teachers to use the internet.