So far, the British Consumer Organization has tested the 1 10 true wireless headset. Among them, only 1 1 was rated as "the best choice" and 8 were rated as "excellent value" (especially good quality and low price), but 17 was marked as "Don't buy" to remind people not to buy. Among the 1 1 headphones rated as "the most worthwhile purchase", 10 headphones were also rated as "environmentally friendly purchase" because these products are particularly conducive to environmental protection.
Among the 1 1 true wireless headphones that were rated as "the most worthwhile to buy" because their test scores were higher than 70%, Apple occupied the top four, with test scores as high as 9 1%, 90%, 80% and 80% respectively. Followed by Sony (test score 76%), Sennheiser (2 models, test scores 75%, 70%), B&; O (test score 73%), Bose (test score 72%), Samsung (2 models, test score 72%, 7 1%)).
Eight real wireless headsets rated as "excellent value" because of their good quality and low price were led by Glory (with a test score of 69%), followed by Sony (with a test score of 68%), Huawei (with two test scores of 67% and 62%), Sennheiser (with a test score of 66%) and JBL (with two test scores of 65% and 60%).
17 The true wireless headphones marked "Don't buy" because the test score is less than 45% include three well-known Sony brands, with test scores of 45%, 44% and 44% respectively. Followed by Master &；; Dynamic(45%), Marshall(44%), Huawei (44%), Groove-E (43%), Nokia (43%), JBL(43%), Skullcandy(4 1%), JLab Audio (4/kloc-0%).
Comparison & amp objective test of European security. Trust e.v. (COTEST) collects tests to seek the aggregation test of Ruth(COTEST)/ European Association for Quality and Safety Testing (COTEST) in order to …