Well documented. Oh, it's not nonsense. There is evidence: of course, it is 39. In fact, 60 minutes' in-situ jogging of Mint consumes 534 calories, 39 minutes' in-situ jogging consumes 29 1 calorie, 60 minutes' outdoor jogging of Baidu Encyclopedia consumes 402 calories, and people's outdoor jogging only consumes 402 calories. Where can I consume 534 calories by standing and jogging? Besides, in-situ jogging is not as strong as outdoor jogging, where can it consume more than outdoor jogging? Based on the unreasonable calculation of mint jogging in situ, I think mint is exaggerated and inaccurate. This is a screenshot of the calories consumed by outdoor jogging for one hour found by Baidu Encyclopedia. Which do you think is more accurate than jogging in place? Of course, Du Niang's Baidu Encyclopedia is a lever. Compared with Baidu Encyclopedia, which is more accurate has already been answered. The factual evidence is right in front of you. Which one do you believe?