The man bought a massage package in the US Mission and was arrested by the police. He was identified as a prostitute in Kunming, Yunnan. Li Man ordered a bath massage package of 299 yuan through Meituan. Unexpectedly, he was suddenly caught by the public security organs while taking a bath and was identified as a prostitute. He was detained for five days. Li refused to accept it and filed a lawsuit with the court. The court ruled this way. On the night of the incident, Li came home from work and felt very tired. He ordered a 299 yuan "barrel bubble bath" package through Meituan, and then contacted the health center by phone. However, when Li was taking a bath, the public security organ suddenly broke into the house and found that Li was suspected of accepting services and was administratively detained for 5 days.

Li refused to accept it and filed a lawsuit in court for the following reasons:

First, he placed an order through the formal and legal Meituan platform, and the purpose of consumption was not to accept acceptable services; Second, the price of 299 yuan is published online. He paid the money directly to the US Mission, not the technicians, so there was no transaction with the technicians. Third, as soon as he went in to spend money, the police came to investigate and were suspected of being "fishing law enforcement"; Fourth, after he was arrested by the public security organs, the police told him that as long as he confessed truthfully, there was no need for punishment, and there was a problem of luring confessions.

After receiving the complaint from the court, the public security organ replied:

First, Meituan is just a platform. Before and after placing the order, Li called the health center twice to confirm the relevant services. Second, they received a normal report to check that there was no fishing law enforcement; Third, they have no problem of luring or cheating confessions. After investigating according to law, they punished Li Jin, as evidenced by the inquiry video. As this case is an administrative lawsuit, the public security organ needs to prove to the court all the evidence that it punished Li according to law. Therefore, the public security organs submitted to the court relevant evidence such as the on-site law enforcement video, the seizure process, the testimony of female technicians, Li's confession, and the inquiry video.

He refused to accept the court's decision. The court held through trial that Li found the massage service through Meituan, but it was not the customer service or related staff of Meituan who provided the service, but the staff of the health care center who provided the service after Li arrived at the store. After being introduced, Li learned that Project 299 included bathing and full body massage. Specific to this case, in the process of bathing and massage, Li knows that there are illegal items and still accepts them, which should be considered as prostitution.

The public security organ determined that Li's whoring was minor and administrative detention for 5 days was more appropriate. In addition, Li did not provide relevant evidence that the public security organs induced confessions and defrauded confessions. To sum up, the court found that the punishment facts of the public security organs were clear, correct and conclusive, and the applicable law was accurate, and rejected Li's claim. Dear readers, what do you think of this?