I met a child recently, in his early twenties. After graduating from junior high school, I went to an art school. After graduating from an art school, I stopped studying.
I used to be biased against such children. I feel that their minds are empty and there is no ink.
The whole person is also frivolous, not calm at all.
Then I met this little friend and asked me to hit my face.
Although children don't go to college, they really read more books than 80% college students.
And it's very miscellaneous, just like this kind of casual book you said.
Children don't just read. They have their own opinions on every kind of book.
Some time ago, I read a book about human nature and personality, and thought it was great to share it with children.
I took a few pages of key content, and then the child analyzed it clearly.
His evaluation of this book and his prediction of its general content are correct, as if he had read it.
One day we chatted, and the topic was children's evaluation of my cognitive secularity.
Then, according to all virtues, filial piety comes first, the deceased comes first, and the fundamental significance of filial piety, etc., he discussed what he thought was vulgar.
It involves philosophy, science, Buddhism and so on, which I don't understand at all.
I, a person who takes up a lot of conversations, have nothing to say.
I want to refute, but because the knowledge reserves are too different, I can't start.
At that time, I lamented that knowledge does not mean how much you have learned, but how much you have read, how much you have learned and how much you will learn.
So don't think that children are reading "casual books". No book is idle, but it contains some truth and philosophy.
The book has its own Yan Ruyu, and the book has its own golden house.
Those children who read casual books will really surprise you when they get better.
Try not to question children who read casual books. They will cite allusions to prove their theory, and then leave you speechless and ashamed of your lack of knowledge.