As the saying goes, eat well for breakfast, eat well for lunch and eat less for dinner. Literally, it can be found that eating less dinner has become a proven way of keeping in good health. A little analysis will show that this statement is very reasonable. Eating well at breakfast is to ensure adequate nutrition intake, and eating full at lunch is because after morning work and labor, physical strength drops and needs to be supplemented. As for eating less for dinner, it is easier to understand. Most people seldom do sports after dinner, and so on.
In fact, eating dinner as little as possible is also to reduce the burden on the digestive system. If you have a full dinner and don't have a certain amount of activity, it will increase the burden on your stomach. Over time, digestive diseases will inevitably affect your health. If we insist on eating a seven-point full dinner and achieve a balanced intake of nutrients, the function of the stomach will not increase the burden, but will get a reasonable rest and maintenance, which is naturally of great practical value for strengthening physical fitness and maintaining a healthy state. But it is also necessary to insist on proper exercise and activities after meals.
In short, although the food intake and nutrition collocation of dinner can't form a unified standard, everyone will choose the corresponding recipe according to their personal preferences, but they should avoid eating too much and stick to the seven-point full eating method as a whole. Whether it is to keep fit or improve health, a scientific and reasonable dinner is a particularly critical link. I believe that most people who pay attention to health care and maintenance will feel the same way and fully realize the practical value of a reasonable diet.