The original text of Lu Yuan Jing Shu Chuan An (V):

The book says, "Conscience is the foundation of the mind, that is, the so-called good nature, which has not been developed, and the silent and motionless body is also great." Why can ordinary people stay on learning evil? Being neutral, silent and fair, since the body belongs to the heart, the conscience is gone. Today's experience shows that there is nothing wrong, but there is nothing wrong. Is it true that conscience is divorced from the body? "

There is nothing bad in nature, so we know there is nothing bad. True knowledge is not in the process of development, that is, the outline is big, the body is silent, and everyone has the same thing: but we must learn to get rid of it; However, in the ontology of conscience, it cannot be added at the beginning. Knowing that there is nothing wrong, but it is not omnipotent, silent, grand duke, not completely covered, but impure ears. Body is the body of conscience, and use is the use of conscience. Would it be better to be out of the body?

In the vernacular, it is like this:

Your letter said: "Conscience is the noumenon of the heart, that is, the nature of goodness, which is the basis of silence and selflessness in the process of development. Why can't most people do this and need to learn? Whether it is' middle',' silent' or' numerous', since it is the noumenon of the heart, it is conscience. Now, if you search your own heart, all your knowledge is not good, except' middle',' quiet' and' Dagong'. Can it be said that conscience has transcended the body and use? "

There is nothing wrong with sex, so there is nothing wrong with cognition. Conscience is not in the hair, that is, Dagong and immobile ontology are owned by all. However, conscience cannot be blinded by material desires; Therefore, it is necessary to eliminate deception through practice. However, doing so will not harm the noumenon of conscience. There is nothing wrong with cognition, but Zhong, Ji and Dagong cannot be completely revealed because they have not completely eliminated deception and have not been preserved purely enough. Body, that is, the body of conscience; Utilization, that is, the utilization of conscience, how can there be a conscience beyond physical utilization?

From here, we find that it is difficult to say clearly what is conscience. Judging from the application of conscience, if it can be "neutral", "silent" and "grand duke", it is conscience. So we can take every cognition as the starting point of conscience. If this starting point can finally achieve "moderation", "silence" and "archduke", then this starting point is conscience.

The initial thing originated from our hearts, because it didn't do any processing at first, so it embodied the body and mind. But this starter is not the best thing, it is full of contradictions, it will split and disappear at any time, it has no creativity, so it is a worthless thing. We must extend it to all our existing concepts, so that it can become a complete unity without contradiction and become something valuable. This is the relationship between body and use, in which body is the foundation and use is the key. Through use, the body realizes self-return and gorgeous turn.

It turns out that conscience is such a simple thing, and its starting point is our daily dribs and drabs. By thinking about these bits and pieces, we can turn these bits and pieces into our correct cognition. Each of us is doing such a thing every day.

If conscience is doing ordinary things, then saints are ordinary people. If we can also realize the role of social consciousness and humanistic spirit in it, then these will be easy to handle.

I don't know if it's right. Write it down.