Have you downloaded the format requirements of your opening report? Have you read the requirements of the school report? Because each school has different requirements for the format of the opening report?
Finally, I wish you a smooth passage of the topic.
Let me explain the experience of this opening report.
First, the overall feeling
It's hard to change roles freely when I just step into graduate school from undergraduate. It used to be step by step.
Classes and exams are going smoothly, and teachers have plans. Now it's all about consciousness. The master leads the door, and practice depends on it.
People, it is really difficult to cultivate the habit of autonomous learning, lack of motivation to learn, and always muddle along.
Today, I realized that the process of plowing cattle can only be advanced by whipping, even if the task is finally completed, it is doomed.
Difficulties and hardships. Senior sister is practicing, teaching is already very tired, and writing papers is really hard.
So some people just want to perfunctory. But all the tutors are very responsible and responsible for every opening report.
Tell everyone to read carefully, find problems and give students constructive guidance, which shows their responsible attitude towards students.
Rigorous style of study and persistence in one's own work. Every suggestion of the tutor is years of experience.
Sedimentation is a heavy and precious wealth for us. So, I thought, since I chose a graduate student,
On this road, I must keep in mind the sentence "We can always do it without forgetting our original intention" and study hard.
Practice, engage in research, and strive to improve personal cultivation. And I am a master of education, and I am also in charge of national education.
The future of the industry, therefore, only by constantly improving their theoretical level and applying it to practice, summing up the classics in practice.
Only by checking and doing research and practice correctly can we become a qualified educator.
Second, thinking about the topic.
"Theme" is the essence of a paper, and it is the eye. Through it, we can not only read the paper, but also spy on the author's inner thoughts. Here are some of my thoughts:
1, the title must be "new".
The so-called "new" is not for "new", but for "new". Just to create a fairy tale out of thin air to learn.
It's a castle in the air, with no solid support at all. In my opinion, novelty means "looking over the ridge"
The peak and distance are different, that is, the perspective is new. Let's not talk about other fields and majors for the time being, just talk about ideological and political education.
As far as education is concerned, there are countless domestic research results. Looking around, it seems that I can't find a virgin land.
Development. It is these smoke bombs that blind our eyes. I am the most innovative and unique person in the world.
The child himself? Can someone copy us completely? No, so stand from your own point of view and use your own.
Think through personal experience, don't try to dig holes for others to learn, your own ideas will always be.
Innovation that others can't replicate. Today, several tutors have repeatedly mentioned that we are the masters of education and have the opportunity.
First-line teaching is a condition that academic graduate students do not have, so we should make full use of this advantage.
Find problems in your own teaching practice. There are many problems in education in China, which are only theoretical.
The discussion has no practical significance, and the problems found in teaching are the problems that need to be solved urgently.
Title. In addition, our major is to train middle school ideological and political education teachers, which is a limitation.
If you focus on this subject, you should highlight the characteristics of this subject on the topic, and you can't talk about the emergence of all subjects in general.
problem Therefore, regarding the topic of my thesis, I think it will take a period of teaching practice to put forward more.
Value, a more novel point of view.
2. The topic must be "precise".
The so-called "essence" is to narrow the scope of the theme to the essence and find a core point for in-depth discussion.
Just like a stone thrown into the water, we should not only study how beautiful the ripples on the water surface are, but also pay attention to this stone.
The state in which the head enters the water. As the saying goes, everything is not perfect. The same is true of the title, as a
Graduate students, our ability is limited, the country, society.
The problem at the meeting level is beyond our ability. If it is too broad, it means "false, big and empty". We just need to do it in front of us.
Study the subject, grade, even the class and the problems in a class you teach. The smaller the scope, the more innovative and profound it is.
The more you dig, the more you can touch the essential problem. For example, there is a paper entitled "Research on Filial Piety of Contemporary Middle School Students", and the tutor said that the topic is very important.
Well, the question of "filial piety" is a new one, but the definition is too broad, which can be summed up as "filial piety in the ideological and political education class in middle schools"
Problem research ",so as to improve the depth of research. Another example is the paper "Application of Inquiry Teaching in Applied Research"
The instructor pointed out that cultural life does not require inquiry-based teaching in every class, and it is best to be specific.
A class to learn. Of course, "essence" should also grasp a certain scale, and ensure that there is something to say and something to say on the premise of accuracy.
The west can be dug.
3. The topic must be "accurate".
The so-called "accurate" means accurate definition.
General scientific research strives for accuracy, speaking with numbers, and there can be no errors. Although the humanities can not be quantified, but
Many concepts are very similar. One more word and one less word will change the original intention. If the definition of the topic is not accurate, it will be easy to go astray in future research.
Wrong direction. For example, there is a paper entitled "Research on the Present Situation, Problems and Strategies of Mental Health Education for Students in Secondary Vocational Schools", and the tutor puts forward that,
"Mental health education" here refers to "mental health education class" in a narrow sense or "mental health education" in a broad sense, both of which are available.
There is a big difference, if there is no clear definition, it will make readers misunderstand. Therefore, academic research should pay attention to the accuracy of language.
4. The topic must be "true".
The so-called "truth" is what really happens and really exists.
When choosing a topic, we often groan in pursuit of innovation, and trivial problems can be magnified just because
No one has studied this problem. This is a vicious circle, and its disadvantage will be that academics are increasingly deviating from its effectiveness. As mentioned earlier.
At present, master of education must focus on practical research when writing papers, which is our characteristic and advantage. So if you want to choose a topic,
"Truth", only practice, practice can produce true knowledge. The paper is a summary of a teaching experience, which you saw with your own eyes and heard with your own ears.
The first-hand information obtained must be more valuable and convincing than what appears in the book. So we should abandon the bad habit of looking down on our superiors.
Habit, bow down to practice, learn by action, and solve problems with your heart.
5. Other questions about the topic selection.
In addition to the problems discussed in detail above, I think we should pay attention to several aspects: practicality, scientificity and feasibility.
Sex and suitability. The tutor didn't focus on the explanation. I sorted out these points by consulting my class notes, and I think they are also worth learning.
Third, thinking about literature review.
Literature review is a summary report of a lot of preparatory work in the early stage of writing. We should not only sort out the literature we have read, but also put forward ourselves.
Opinions. Literature review reflects the breadth and depth of the author's reading, so we need to pay attention to several issues:
1, the literature should be as comprehensive as possible. We say that if a teacher wants to give a student a glass of water, he must have a bucket of water, and the same is true for writing a paper.
Only by consulting a large number of relevant documents can we fully understand the development of the subject, including foreign and domestic, and I have no idea.
It is difficult to write a well-founded paper with enough ink. This inspired me to read more books, read good books and make full use of the library and the Internet.
Network resources, broaden knowledge.
2. Choose newer literature. Our topic selection should be innovative, references should keep pace with the times, follow the academic development trend and screen.
Selecting the latest literature can better reflect the characteristics of the times and make it easier for us to combine with reality.
3. Select representative, scientific and reliable documents. As the old saying goes, you are in a hurry to see a doctor. We often go out when writing.
At present, all I read are documents related to the topic, so I can't find the key points, and I don't even consider the reliability of the documents.
Sex, the result is "flowers gradually want to charm the eyes", can't tell which is good or bad. Therefore, the choice of literature should be searched by authoritative organizations.
So, pay attention to screening and don't believe everything.
4. Be loyal to the referees. We often have the psychology that the materials we choose are all for the sake of papers, so we have to publish them.
When the content is inconsistent with the viewpoint of the paper, some materials will be selectively tampered with to satisfy the paper. I've made such mistakes myself.
Wrong. In the future research, we should respect science, maintain a rigorous scientific research attitude and seek truth from facts.
Fourthly, thinking about the framework of the thesis.
Frame is the skeleton of the whole paper and the reflection of the author's thoughts. I think we should pay attention to several issues when writing the framework of the thesis:
1, think clearly. Including two aspects, one is the relevance of each title. In other words, the titles of papers should have a certain order.
Sex, such as the common formula of "purpose-meaning-present situation-problem-strategy", should be logical, and there is generally no problem in this respect. The second one is
Whether the content under a certain heading is appropriate. Our thesis will involve three-level titles or even four-level titles, and the more levels, the easier it is to be confused.
What should belong to this title is written under other titles, and the consistency between content and title is not high, which seems to be suitable for this standard.
Title, and suitable for that title. Therefore, as mentioned above, the topic should be accurate, and then the ideas should be closely related to the theme, which has a strong shot in the arm.
For sex, it is not easy to confuse.
2. prioritize. This still needs to be combined with the topic. There is a common problem in today's opening report, that is
This is putting the cart before the horse. Everyone puts forward a question to study according to their own practice, and introduces the relevant principle of this question first when writing.
On knowledge, such as purpose, meaning and principle. And then start to talk about practical significance. The idea is right, but it's just discussing theory.
The picture is too long. These theories are summarized by predecessors and written in books. There is no need to take it out for a long time, so people can't see the new ideas.
It seems like a bunch of ideas, and the practical part should be the focus, but it has been ignored. This phenomenon is very common when we do papers, when
When we collect a lot of relevant information, we hope to write it all down on paper to show how good we are, but this is not the case, which will make us
When readers praise your reading, they think you have no ego. Therefore, research should be down-to-earth, think more and create more.
The above is the experience of attending the opening report meeting. Wish you all the best!