Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Health preserving class - What's the difference between a street and a community?
What's the difference between a street and a community?
The differences between community and sub-district offices are as follows:

Dao Office is an agency of the district government, and it is a grass-roots organization that implements social management on behalf of the district-level government within its jurisdiction. Its management mode is administrative.

Community neighborhood committees are residents' self-governing organizations, which conduct community management on behalf of residents in the community, and their management means is self-management.

First, the geographical scope of the community is unclear, and the management function of the community organization is unclear, which leads to the division of politics and society at the street management level and greatly increases the workload. For a long time, we have always regarded the administrative area under the jurisdiction of the sub-district office as a community area, so the sub-district office has two jobs. As an agency of urban grass-roots government, sub-district offices exercise comprehensive administrative functions on behalf of the government to grass-roots society, and at the same time, as representatives of community residents, exercise community self-management functions. The integration of politics and society at the street management level, coupled with the lack of clear system regulations on its own management scope, makes the phenomenon of ultra vires management or ultra vires management happen from time to time, which leads to a great increase in the workload of the office and is often in a state of exhaustion.

Second, the responsibilities of neighborhood committees are vague, and the working methods are administrative, which leads to the offside of neighborhood offices. Originally, the sub-district office only performed some administrative functions, but in fact it undertook a variety of tasks such as administration, law enforcement and economic development, which made it evolve from a grass-roots political institution to a comprehensive institution integrating administrative management, community management and service. In addition, the relationship between neighborhood offices and neighborhood committees has also become a de facto relationship between leaders and leaders, which makes the daily work of neighborhood committees have to obey the arrangement of neighborhood offices, thus falling into a lot of complicated specific affairs. The relationship between neighborhood offices and community neighborhood committees should change from "leading" to "guiding" and "being guided"