First of all, please understand that most debate topics are only an incomplete topic, which is often not targeted, too general and unrealistic. The key lies in how to guide the views of both sides and how to make their own views more practical. No matter how you argue, it has no practical significance.

Take your topic as an example.

If you object, then you must mean that college students do not participate in voluntary activities to exercise, which means that this has become an incomplete topic, but what is it? It can be a lot. As long as you guide him methodically, rationally and logically, you can use it as your argument to explain your point of view.

There are three key words in this topic, the first college student, the second volunteer and the third exercise, each of which has many topics to discuss.

For example, sports, what is sports? Actually, no one arranged it. What exactly does the word sports mean? We can simply understand that we can experience it through an exercise, or gain an experience, or improve ourselves. These are our understanding of the fuzziness and inertia of the word sports. Then this will give both sides a lot of space. In this case, just like a question has more than three standard answers, whether it is A, B, C or D, it can be said that the other party is wrong or incomplete. This is a key skill in the debate.

Argument 1, you can say that the focus is not on exercise but on experience, depending on how you interpret the two words and introduce your point of view.

Argument 2, you can say that the key is not exercise but participation. Similarly, it depends on how you introduce your point of view. Here, you can split the connotation behind the keyword college students. The main energy of introducing college students is to go to school and participate in it with a normal heart. Or take out the keyword volunteer activity and split it up, introduce the connotation behind volunteer activity, and say that since it is a volunteer activity, it is more in line with the concept of participation.

Argument 3, you can say that the focus is not on exercise but on what kind of attitude to establish, and the key depends on how you introduce it.

Argument 4, you can say that if you focus on exercise, it is a wrong concept, because if the purpose must be set on exercise, the original value of the activity will shrink.

Argument 5, you can even say that if college students regard voluntary activities as an exercise, then everyone has different understanding of exercise and produces different effects. Because there is no standard answer to different effects, you can introduce other viewpoints to break the other party's argument. Here is an example. For example, college students participate in the Spring Festival long-distance running to promote national fitness, and the focus is on sports (you can set a trap for each other first, and even ask each other that the focus of such activities is not sports, what is it? Or ask what is the key exercise? ) Compared with physical education class, you get more exercise, so it's wrong to concentrate on long-distance running. After all, activities are not held every day, and physical education class can provide them every day.

In fact, there are many arguments to find. I only gave five examples. If we follow this line of thinking, we can think of dozens.

As the opposing party, the best way is to wait for the other party to make an argument before breaking it, rather than saying your own argument in advance. If the other party gives a correct argument, then split the question or introduce new ideas to break the other party's argument, and eventually the other party will become helpless. For another example, A says that learning is inseparable from hard work, and you can say that methods are also very important (you can also ask what hard work is and find out each other's shortcomings to argue). A If learning is inseparable from hard work and methods, you can say that good teachers and good guidance are more important (you can also ask what hard work or methods are and find out each other's shortcomings to argue). If A says that learning is inseparable from hard work and methods, as well as good teachers and guidance, it can also be said that the purpose is more important. Without purpose, there is no motivation (you can also ask what is hard work or what is a good teacher, and argue with each other's shortcomings). If A says that learning is inseparable from hard work and methods, from good teachers and guidance, and has a good purpose, you can say that the purpose is not important, but interest is important.

I hope it helps you.